Moss Landing Commercial Park LLC v. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation et al
Filing
100
STIPULATION AND ORDER 99 Continuing Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 11/4/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/1/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
THOMAS M. DONNELLY (SBN 136546)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 875-5880
Facsimile: (415) 875-5700
email: tmdonnelly@jonesday.com
Attorneys for Defendants KAISER ALUMINUM
CORPORATION and KAISER ALUMINUM &
CHEMICAL CORPORATION
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
MOSS LANDING COMMERCIAL PARK
LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
CASE NO. C07 06072 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION,
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL
CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through
100,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
WHEREAS, plaintiff Moss Landing Commercial Park (“MLCP”) has filed and served its
19
First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) upon defendants Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and
20
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (collectively, the “Kaiser Defendants”), and the
21
Kaiser Defendants have answered such Complaint;
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Kaiser Defendants assert that this lawsuit is barred by the relief granted
to the Kaiser Defendants in their Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings;
WHEREAS, the Kaiser Defendants sought and obtained an order from the Delaware
Bankruptcy Court requiring MLCP to dismiss its Complaint;
WHEREAS, MLCP appealed therefrom to the Delaware District Court, and then to the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals;
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals instructed the Delaware
SFI-698450v3
-1-
USDC NDCA C07 06072 RMW
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
1
District Court to remand the case to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court for the Bankruptcy Court to
2
provide a decision as to whether each cause of action in this lawsuit was discharged or otherwise
3
released, waived or settled. The case was remanded back to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court by
4
order of the Delaware District Court on September 16, 2010. The matter has been fully briefed,
5
yet the hearing has been continued in light of the parties’ settlement agreement described below.
6
Thus, the Bankruptcy Court has not yet issued a decision;
7
WHEREAS, the parties have signed a settlement agreement and have filed a Motion in the
8
Delaware Bankruptcy Court for review and approval. The parties have requested a September 26
9
hearing date on that Motion. Assuming the settlement is approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the
10
settlement will require MLCP to dismiss this lawsuit with prejudice; and
11
WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve judicial resources and their litigation expenses.
12
NOW, THEREFORE, plaintiff MLCP and the Kaiser Defendants stipulate and
13
14
15
16
respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows:
1.
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 2, 2011,
shall be continued to November 4, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6.
2.
Not later than October 28, 2011, MLCP shall dismiss this action with prejudice or
17
the parties shall file a joint Case Management Conference Statement.
18
Dated: August 26, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER C. CAYCE
19
By: /s/ Christopher C. Cayce
CHRISTOPHER C. CAYCE
Attorneys for Plaintiff MOSS LANDING
COMMERCIAL PARK LLC
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SFI-698450v3
-2-
USDC NDCA C07 06072 RMW
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
1
2
Dated: August 26, 2011
3
4
JONES DAY
By: /s/ Thomas M. Donnelly
THOMAS M. DONNELLY
Attorneys for Defendants KAISER ALUMINUM
CORPORATION and KAISER ALUMINUM &
CHEMICAL CORPORATION
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10
, 2011
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SFI-698450v3
-3-
USDC NDCA C07 06072 RMW
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?