Echostar Satellite LLC et al v. Freetech Inc

Filing 73

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 71 Motion for Certification and Reconsideration (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-FILED 11/12/08* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC, et al. v. Plaintiffs, NO. C 07-6124 JW (RS) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AND FOR RECONSIDERATION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FREETECH, INC., et al., Defendants. / On September 29, 2008, the Court granted Freetech's motion for a protective order. Echostar now moves for certification for appeal to the Ninth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B), and in the alternative, for reconsideration of that order. At a hearing on November 12, 2008, on a related motion to compel, the Court stated that it would deny Echostar's motion for certification and reconsideration, and vacate the hearing date set for December 10, 2008. Echostar's motion is procedurally deficient. The motion to certify should be filed before the presiding district judge. This Court does not have the authority to certify a question for Circuit Court review where the Court's jurisdiction is to act as the referral judge only. The motion to reconsider was not filed in accordance with Civil L.R. 7-9 as the Rule requires Echostar to seek leave to file such a motion. In any event, had Echostar sought leave to file the motion, that motion would have been denied as it fails to identify any one of the enumerated bases under the Rule whereby such a motion could be granted. The motion, therefore, is denied. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AND FOR RECONSIDERATION C 07-6124 JW (RS) 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO: Andrew P. Bridges abridges@winston.com, cfernandez@winston.com, docketsf@winston.com, mabutler@winston.com Chad M. Hagan chagan@twwlaw.com chagan@twwlaw.com tfrank@twwlaw.com, cresendez@twwlaw.com, mgaunt@twwlaw.com Chad Michael Hagan Frank Michael Timothy Fred von Lohmann fred@eff.org jgolinveaux@winston.com, cfernandez@winston.com, mscherb@winston.com, laegan@winston.com Jennifer A. Golinveaux docketsf@winston.com Matthew Alex Scherb Richard R. Olsen Roy K. McDonald rolsen@twwlaw.com roy.mcdonald@dlapiper.com, tee.thomas@dlapiper.com stephen.chiari@dlapiper.com, judith.fazackerley@dlapiper.com sferguson@twwlaw.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stephen Andrew Chiari Stephen Matthew Ferguson Timothy M. Frank tfrank@twwlaw.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 11/12/08 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Chambers ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AND FOR RECONSIDERATION C 07-6124 JW (RS) 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?