Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 179

STIPULATION AND ORDER 177 Extending Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Elec & Eltek (USA) and Wurth Electronics Midcom's Answer and Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/21/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Juanita Brooks (CA#75934 / [e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Limin Zheng (CA #226875 / [e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Michael J. Kane (Admitted pro hac vice / [e-mail]) William R. Woodford (Admitted pro hac vice / [e-mail]) Michael J. Pape (Admitted pro hac vice / [e-mail]) John C. Adkisson (Admitted pro hac vice / [e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 3200 RBC Plaza 60 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.

*E-FILED - 4/21/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEL FUSE INC., E & E MAGNETIC PRODUCTS LIMITED, ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC., WURTH ELEKTRONIK GMBH & CO. KG, and XFMRS, INC., Defendants Civil Case No. 07-6222 RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170) Case No. 07-6222 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6.1(a), Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. ("Halo") and Defendants Elec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E (USA)") and Wurth Electronics Midcom, Inc. ("Wurth"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Halo to respond to E&E (USA) and Wurth's respective Answers and Counterclaims to Halo's First Amended Complaint (Doc Nos. 168 and 170, respectively) from April 19, 2010 until, and including May 3, 2010. Such extension will provide the parties an opportunity to meet and confer on Halo's motion to strike the inequitable conduct allegations in E&E (USA) and Wurth's Answers, which Halo currently intends to file with its Answers to E&E (USA) and Wurth's Counterclaims. Halo and Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited ("EEMPL"), by and through their counsel, further stipulate that EEMPL will have until and including May 7, 2010 to file answer or otherwise respond to Halo's First Amended Complaint. The parties do not believe that the proposed extension of time will alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order. Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 19, 2010

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Michael J. Kane Michael J. Kane Attorneys for Plaintiff HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.

1

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170) Case No. 07-6222 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: April 19, 2010

BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael J. Powell Michael J. Powell Attorneys for Defendant ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION

Dated: April 19, 2010

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By: /s/ Emily R. Frank Emily R. Frank Attorneys for Defendant WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4/21/10 Dated: ___________________

__________________________________ HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170) Case No. 07-6222 RMW

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to the Northern District of California Electronic Filing Procedures and General Order No. 45, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories listed above.

Dated:

April 19, 2010

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Limin Zheng__________________ Limin Zheng Attorney for Plaintiff HALO, INC.

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170) Case No. 07-6222 RMW

3