Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 230

ORDER requesting briefing within 5 days from Elec & Eltek (USA) Corp. regarding 220 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Whyte on 6/3/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A request to seal must establish that the document, or portions thereof, is privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Civ. L. R. 79-5(a). The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing of only sealable material. Id. Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited ("E&E Magnetic") moves to file under seal a portion of its reply brief for its motion to dismiss as well as Exhibit A to the reply. E&E Magnetic has represented that it seeks to file this material under seal because it has been designated "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Eltec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E USA"). Having reviewed the material that E&E Magnetic seeks to file under seal, the court is unable to ascertain the reason why E&E USA believes the information is confidential. The court therefore requests that E&E USA submit within 5 days an identification of the portions of material that it feels is ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL E-FILED on 6/3/10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEL FUSE INC., ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC., XFMRS, INC., Defendants. No. C-07-06222 RMW ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL [Re Docket No. 220] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 confidential and an explanation for why it is confidential. Absent a satisfactory explanation, the court will deny the motion to seal. DATED: 6/3/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Juanita R. Brooks Limin Zheng John Cameron Adkisson Michael J Kane Michael J. Pape William R. Woodford Counsel for Defendants: Joshua L. Raskin Andrew P. Nemiroff Martin C. Fliesler Martin G. Raskin Rex Hwang Kent Andrew Lambert Michael Joseph Powell Samuel F Miller Sarah Katherine Casey Terry John Mollica Harold C. Moore Christopher Todd Norris David Moorman jraskin@wolfblock.com anemiroff@cozen.com mcf@fdml.com mraskin@cozen.com rhwang@fdml.com klambert@bakerdonelson.com mpowell@bakerdonelson.com smiller@bakerdonelson.com skcasey@bakerdonelson.com tjm@cmlawoffices.com hcmoore@maginot.com todd.norris@bullivant.com drmoorman@maginot.com brooks@fr.com zheng@fr.com jca@fr.com kane@fr.com pape@fr.com woodford@fr.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 6/3/10 CCL Chambers of Judge Whyte ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?