Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 232

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting in part and denying in part 220 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited ("E&E Magnetic") moves to file under seal a portion of its reply brief for its motion to dismiss as well as Exhibit A to the reply. E&E Magnetic has represented that it seeks to file this material under seal because it has been designated "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Eltec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E USA"). On June 3, 2010, the court issued an order requesting E&E USA to submit an identification of the portions of material that it feels is confidential and an explanation for why it is confidential. E&E USA has represented that it does not object to making the unredacted versions of the reply brief and Exhibit A available to the public, with the exception of page seven of Exhibit A, which contains confidential information including the dates of specific activities in relation to accused products. The court therefore grants the motion to seal with respect to page seven of Exhibit A and denies the motion to
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL

E-FILED on

6/8/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEL FUSE INC., ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC., XFMRS, INC., Defendants.

No. C-07-06222 RMW ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL [Re Docket No. 220]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

seal in all other respects. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), E&E Magnetic has four days to refile the documents in a manner that conforms to this order.

DATED:

6/8/10

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Juanita R. Brooks Limin Zheng John Cameron Adkisson Michael J Kane Michael J. Pape William R. Woodford Counsel for Defendants: Joshua L. Raskin Andrew P. Nemiroff Martin C. Fliesler Martin G. Raskin Rex Hwang Kent Andrew Lambert Michael Joseph Powell Samuel F Miller Sarah Katherine Casey Terry John Mollica Harold C. Moore Christopher Todd Norris David Moorman [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated:

6/8/10

CCL Chambers of Judge Whyte

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-07-06222 RMW CCL 3