Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al
Filing
242
ORDER re 229 Defendant Elec & Eltek (USA) Corporation's Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/17/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., v. Plaintiff, No. C07-06222 RMW (HRL) ORDER RE DEFENDANT E&E USA'S MOTION TO SEAL [Re: Docket No. 229] *E-FILED 06-17-2010*
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BEL FUSE INC., E & E MAGNETIC PRODUCTS LIMITED, ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC., WURTH ELEKTRONIK GMBH & CO. KG, and XFMRS, INC., Defendants. /
Defendant Elec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E USA") moves to seal Exhibit A to Declaration of Kent Lambert filed in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel jurisdictional discovery. This court has not, however, received an unredacted copy of Exhibit A, which reportedly is a copy of E&E USA's responses to plaintiff's first set of requests for production. Additionally, E&E USA seeks to justify the seal merely by asserting that the information has been designated "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only." This falls far short of the requisite showing. E&E USA must establish that the subject document (or portions of it) is privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. CIV. L. R. 795(a). Accordingly, no later than June 21, 2010, E&E USA shall (a) deliver an unredacted
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
copy of Exhibit A to this court's chambers; and (b) submit declaration(s) from appropriate person(s) showing why sealing is warranted. Absent a satisfactory showing, the motion to seal will be denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 17, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5:07-cv-06222-RMW Notice has been electronically mailed to: A. Neal Seth nseth@bakerlaw.com, nseth@bakerlaw.com anemiroff@cozen.com, jcipriani@cozen.com, rbrenner@cozen.com todd.norris@bullivant.com, sanfranciscodocketing@bullivant.com
Andrew P. Nemiroff
Christopher Todd Norris David Moorman Emily Rita Frank Harold C. Moore
drmoorman@maginot.com efrank@bakerlaw.com hcmoore@maginot.com jca@fr.com, mla@fr.com
John Cameron Adkisson Joshua L. Raskin Juanita R. Brooks
JRaskin@WOLFBLOCK.com brooks@fr.com, gonzales@fr.com, srodriguez@fr.com
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Kent Andrew Lambert klambert@bakerdonelson.com, lhunter@bakerdonelson.com, psigmon@bakerdonelson.com Limin Zheng zheng@fr.com, horsley@fr.com
Martin C. Fliesler mcf@fdml.com, cakinselledge@fdml.com, etf@fdml.com, jgeringson@fdml.com, mme@fdml.com Martin G. Raskin Michael J Kane Michael J. Pape mraskin@cozen.com, jcipriani@cozen.com, rbrenner@cozen.com kane@fr.com, skarboe@fr.com, stenen@fr.com pape@fr.com, mla@fr.com mpowell@bakerdonelson.com, pburks@bakerdonelson.com
Michael Joseph Powell Rex Hwang
rhwang@fdml.com, cakinselledge@fdml.com smiller@bakerdonelson.com skcasey@bakerdonelson.com
Samuel F Miller
Sarah Katherine Casey Terry John Mollica William R. Woodford
tjm@cmlawoffices.com woodford@fr.com, skarboe@fr.com, stenen@fr.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?