Pintor v. Credigy Services Corporation et al

Filing 73

ORDER GRANTING re 67 MOTION to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/10/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Ronald Wilcox SBN 176601 LAW OFFICE OF RONALD WILCOX 2160 The Alameda, 1st Flr., Suite F San José, CA 95126-1001 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Balám O. Letona SBN 229642 LAW OFFICE OF BALÁM O. LETONA, INC. 1347 Pacific Avenue, Suite 203 Santa Cruz, CA 95060-3940 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSÉ DIVISION MARTHA VASQUEZ PINTOR, Plaintiff, v. CREDIGY SERVICES CORPORATION, CREDIGY RECEIVABLES INC., CREDIGY SOLUTIONS INC., BRETT BOYDE, MARK DOE and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: C07-06428 JF HL PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR SEALING ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(d)

TO:

CREDIGY SERVICES CORPORATION, CREDIGY RECEIVABLES INC., CREDIGY SOLUTIONS INC., BRETT BOYDE, MARK DOE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiffs are filing this administrative motion for a sealing

order for the following documents: 1. Un-redacted version of the Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim 2. Exhibit 1: Collection Logs. 3. Exhibit 5: General Services Agreement between CSC and Solucoes Brazil. 1 Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Sealing Order Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d)

These documents have been designated as confidential by Defendant Credigy Services 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Sealing Order Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d) Dated: 9/10/08 _______________________________ Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Balam O. Letona Balám O. Letona LAW OFFICE OF BALÁM O. LETONA, INC. 1347 Pacific Avenue, Suite 203 Santa Cruz, CA 95060-3940 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Dated: September 5, 2008 Respectfully submitted, order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. Corporation. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), Plaintiffs are submitting these documents in support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim and are lodging these documents with the Court. Local Rule 79-5(d) requires that to have these documents filed under seal, the designating party must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable, and must be lodge and serve as narrowly tailored sealing