Sorensen v. Lexar Media, Inc.

Filing 214

ORDER by Judge Edward J. Davila denying 202 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 210 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

JENS ERIK SORENSEN, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
LEXAR MEDIA, INC,
Defendant.

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:08-CV-00095 EJD
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 202, 210)

On, December 30, 2011, Defendant filed a motion for leave to file under seal Exhibit 2 and

17

Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of John Beynon in Support of Second Motion To Amend Pleadings.

18

See Docket No. 202. On January 20, 2012, Defendant filed a motion for leave to file under seal

19

Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of John Beynon in Support of Lexar’s Reply Brief to Its

20

Second Motion To Amend Pleadings. See Docket No. 210.

21

Defendant seeks to file these documents under seal pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d) because

22

Plaintiffs designated them as confidential. Civil L.R. 79-5(d) requires that, within seven days after

23

a motion to seal is filed, the designating party must file a declaration establishing that the

24

information is sealable. Plaintiffs have filed no declaration in support of these motions.

25

Accordingly,

26

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions to seal are DENIED. No later than March 3,

27
28
1
Case No.: 5:08-CV-00095 EJD
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL

1

2012, Defendant shall file the aforementioned exhibits in the public record.

2

Dated: February 22, 2012

3

_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:08-CV-00095 EJD
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL