Hologic, Inc. et al v. SenoRx, Inc

Filing 522

STIPULATION AND ORDER 521 Extending Deadline to File Dispositive Motions. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/13/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nicholas H. Lee (SBN 229588) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 777 S. Figueroa Street, 44th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 E-mail: nicholas.lee@aporter.com Jeffrey E. Faucette (SBN 193066) SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 315-1669 Facsimile: (415) 433-5994 E-mail: jeff@skaggsfaucette.com Matthew M. Wolf (admitted pro hac vice) John E. Nilsson (admitted pro hac vice) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street N.W. Washington, DC 20004-1206 Telephone: (202) 942-5000 Facsimile: (202) 942-5999 E-mail: matthew.wolf@aporter.com E-mail: john.nilsson@aporter.com Bruce R. Genderson (admitted pro hac vice) Aaron P. Maurer (admitted pro hac vice) Adam D. Harber (admitted pro hac vice) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 434-5000 Facsimile: (202) 434-5029 E-mail: bgenderson@wc.com E-mail: amaurer@wc.com E-mail: aharber@wc.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP. and HOLOGIC L.P. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant SENORX, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP. and Case No. C-08-0133 RMW ) HOLOGIC L.P., ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ) Plaintiffs, [] ORDER EXTENDING ) DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE ) v. MOTIONS ) ) ) SENORX, INC., ) ) Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS CASE NO. C-08-0133 RMW 1 Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 2 requesting an extension of the deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions in this matter. 3 Under the Court’s Scheduling Order, the current deadline is December 14, 2012. The parties 4 stipulate and agree to move this deadline to December 21, 2012. An extension of this deadline 5 was previously requested and received on August 8, 2012 (Dkt. No. 518). The parties agree that 6 no prejudice will come as a result of this extension. 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 9 Dated: December 12, 2012 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 10 s/ Matthew M. Wolf 11 Matthew M. Wolf Attorneys for Plaintiffs HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP. and HOLOGIC L.P. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP s/ Jeffrey E. Faucette Attorneys for Defendant SENORX, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS CASE NO. C-08-0133 RMW 1 2 Filer’s Attestation I, Jeffrey E. Faucette, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 3 to file this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to File Dispositive Motions. 4 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, ¶ X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the 5 filing of the document has been obtained from Plaintiffs’ counsel. 6 By: ___/s/_ _ Jeffrey E. Faucette 7 _____ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS CASE NO. C-08-0133 RMW 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION ) HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP. and Case No. C-08-0133 RMW ) HOLOGIC L.P., ) [] ORDER ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) SENORX, INC., ) ) Defendant. 10 11 Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 12 deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions in this matter has been extended from 13 December 14, 2012 to and including December 21, 2012. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED 15 16 17 DATED: December ___, 2012 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS CASE NO. C-08-0133 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?