Sorto v. Hannegan, Benson & Company, Inc. et al

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 62 Stipulation filed by Jose De La Paz Sorto. The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement for 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 07/02/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010)

Jose De La Paz Sorto v. Hannegan, Benson & Company, Inc. et al

Doc. 63

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION

** E-filed July 2, 2010 **

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JOSE DE LA PAZ SORTO, on behalf of himself and similarly situated others, v. Plaintiff, No. C08-00189 HRL ORDER DISMISSING CASE [Re: Docket No. 62]

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

HANNEGAN, BENSON & CO., INC., dba C.B. HANNEGAN'S; CHRIS BENSON; and Does 1­10, Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (Docket No. 62), this action, in its entirety, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement for 30 days. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 2, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C08-00189 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Adam Wang [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] Adam Lee Pedersen [e-mail] Michael Jay Jones [e-mail] Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

2