Portillo et al v. Sarneveslit

Filing 19

ORDER Vacating Scheduling Order re 18 Scheduling Order; Referring Case for Reassignment to a Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Parties' Content. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/11/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 11, 2008 JAMES WARE United States District Judge Upon filing, this case was scheduled for a case management conference on September 15, 2008. The parties were unable to meet and confer, and thus have submitted separate Case Management Statements. (See Docket Item No. 14, 17.) However, despite their separate submissions, the parties have consented to assignment to a Magistrate Judge for all purposes. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court VACATES its Scheduling Order and refers this case to the Clerk for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Adel Portillo, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nader Sarnevesht, et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. C 08-00190 JW ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING ORDER; REFERRING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO PARTIES' CONSENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Adam Wang waqw@sbcglobal.net Jonathan Jackel jonathan@roussojackel.com Dated: September 11, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?