Pham et al

Filing 45

ORDER DIRECTING SCOPE OF ORAL ARGUMENT re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court directs the parties to prepare to address and present evidence on the following issues at oral argument. Please see Order for specifics re argument. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In re ComUnity Lending, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-00201 JW ORDER DIRECTING SCOPE OF ORAL ARGUMENT United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 2, 2008 / Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' First and Third Causes of Action. (Docket Item No. 21). The parties are scheduled to appear before the Court for oral argument at on October 6, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. Having reviewed the parties' papers, the Court directs the parties to prepare to address and present evidence on the following issues at oral argument: (1) (2) When did Defendant become insolvent, if at all? What evidence is available regarding tax treatment of funds contributed to the Top Hat Plan during the period in which the Plan was in effect? JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Jesse Landis Hill JLBHill@aol.com John Walshe Murray jwmurray@murraylaw.com Matthew Brooks Borden mborden@linerlaw.com Robert Anthony Franklin rfranklin@murraylaw.com Ronald Scott Kravitz Rkravitz@LinerLaw.com Dated: October 2, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?