Ralston .v Mortgage Investors Group, Inc., et.al.

Filing 304

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP IN SUPPORT OF CORRECTED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (approving 302 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/5/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 Lori E. Andrus lori@andrusanderson.com 2 Jennie Lee Anderson jennie@andrusanderson.com 3 ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 4 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 David M. Arbogast darbogast@law111.com 6 Jeffrey K. Berns jberns@law111.com 7 ARBOGAST & BERNS LLP 6303 Owensmouth Ave., 10th Floor 8 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 JAY RALSTON, individually and on behalf of 14 all others similarly situated, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP, INC.; MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP, a general 18 partnership; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, 19 20 INC. AND DOES 3-10, Case No. 08-CV-00536 JF (PSG) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP IN SUPPORT OF CORRECTED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Courtroom: 3 - 5th Floor Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. 5:08-CV-00536-JF (PSG) 1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP IN SUPPORT OF CORRECTED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 3 Plaintiff Jay Ralston (“Plaintiff”), and defendants Mortgage Investors Group, Inc. and 4 Mortgage Investors Group, a general partnership (collectively, “MIG,” and, together with Plaintiff, 5 the “Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: 6 WHEREAS on June 8, 2011, the Court approved a stipulation among the Parties providing 7 for a five-page extension for Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (“Motion”) (for a total of 30 8 pages); a five-page extension for MIG’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion (for a total of 30 pages); 9 and a three-page extension for Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of the Motion (for a total of 18 10 pages); 11 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2011, Plaintiff requested and MIG agreed to a further 10-page 12 extension (for a total of 28 pages) for his class certification reply; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff maintains that the additional 10 pages are necessary and appropriate 14 for him to address MIG’s opposition arguments and make a full and complete presentation of the 15 Court on the class certification issue; 16 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the 17 Parties, by their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff shall have a total of 28 pages for his reply in 18 further support of his Motion for Class Certification. 19 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. 5:08-CV-00536-JF (PSG) 1 Dated: October 4, 2011 /s/ Jeffrey K. Berns Lori E. Andrus lori@andrusanderson.com Jennie Lee Anderson jennie@andrusanderson.com ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 2 3 4 5 David M. Arbogast darbogast@law111.com Jeffrey K. Berns jberns@law111.com ARBOGAST & BERNS LLP 6303 Owensmouth Ave., 10th Floor Woodland Hills, CA 91367 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff: Jay Ralston 10 11 Dated: October 4, 2011 /s/ Roland P. Reynolds Roland P. Reynolds rreynolds@pldlawyers.com PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP 515 South Flower Street, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendants Mortgage Investors Group, Inc. and Mortgage Investors Group, A General Partnership 15 16 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 20 21 Dated: _____________________ _______________________________ Judge Jeremy Fogel 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. 5:08-CV-00536-JF (PSG) 1 2 ECF CERTIFICATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X.B., the filing attorney attests that he has obtained 3 concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document. 4 5 Dated: October 4, 2011 ARBOGAST & BERNS LLP 6303 Owensmouth Ave., 10th Floor Woodland Hills, CA 91367 6 7 By: /s/Jeffrey K. Berns 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. 5:08-CV-00536-JF (PSG) 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I further certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on October 4, 2011. 3 4 5 6 /s/ Jeffrey K. Berns Jeffrey K. Berns 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. 5:08-CV-00536-JF (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?