Ralston .v Mortgage Investors Group, Inc., et.al.

Filing 64

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 42 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND TAKING MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/12/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 3/12/09 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge C a s e No. C 08-536 JF (RS) O R D E R VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ( JF L C 2 ) **E-Filed 3/12/09** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JAY J. RALSTON, Plaintiff, v. MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Case Number C 08-536 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND TAKING MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his pleading is set for hearing on March 13, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. However, the Court concludes that the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on Plaintiff's motion is VACATED. An order addressing both Plaintiff's motion and Defendants' pending motion to dismiss will be issued shortly. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Copies of Order served on: David M. Arbogast darbogast@law111.com, jkerr@law111.com Gerson Harry Smoger gerson@texasinjurylaw.com, kelly@texasinjurylaw.com, markballer@gmail.com Jeffrey K Berns jberns@law111.com, staff@jeffbernslaw.com Jennie Lee Anderson jennie@andrusanderson.com Lori Erin Andrus lori@andrusanderson.com Roland Paul Reynolds rreynolds@pldlawyers.com, aramos@pldlawyers.com Steven Michael Bronson steven.bronson@gmail.com 2 C a s e No. C 08-536 JF (RS) O R D E R VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ( JF L C 2 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?