NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. -v- LSI Corporation

Filing 332

ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SCHEDULING HEARING ON SUBSEQUENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Case Management Conference set for 6/22/2009 is VACATED. Plaintiff's anticipated second motion set for 10/26/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Plaintiff shall notice its motion in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2009 10:00 AM. Joint Case Management Conference statement due 10/16/2009. The parties&# 039; Statement shall address, among other things, a schedule for proceeding with the remainder of this case. Discovery is opened so that the parties may obtain relevant information from each other to file or defend the anticipated motion for summary judgment. All discovery disputes are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/18/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc., v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-00775 JW ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SCHEDULING HEARING ON SUBSEQUENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LSI Corporation, et al., Defendants. This case is scheduled for a case management conference on June 22, 2009. Pursuant to the Court's May 27, 2009 Order, the parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement. Based on their joint submission, the Court finds that it is premature to set a Patent Scheduling Order at this time since Plaintiff intends to file a subsequent motion for summary judgment in light of the Court's May 28, 2009 Order. Accordingly, the case management conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following briefing schedule: (1) The parties shall appear for a hearing on Plaintiff's anticipated second motion for summary judgment on October 26, 2009 at 9 a.m. Plaintiff shall notice its motion in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. (2) The parties shall appear for a subsequent case management conference on October 26, 2009 at 10 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management on or before October 16, 2009. The parties' Statement shall address, among other things, a schedule for proceeding with the remainder of this case. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (3) Discovery is opened so that the parties may obtain relevant information from each other to file or defend the anticipated motion for summary judgment. All discovery disputes are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Dated: June 18, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Brett Michael Schuman bschuman@morganlewis.com Crawford Maclain Wells mwells@irell.com Daniel Johnson djjohnson@morganlewis.com Gregg Paris Yates gyates@morganlewis.com Herman Joseph Freder Hoying hhoying@morganlewis.com Jason George Sheasby Jsheasby@Irell.com Jonathan Henry Steinberg jsteinberg@irell.com Michael Eric Molland mmolland@morganlewis.com Ryan Lindsay Scher rscher@morganlewis.com Samuel Kai Lu slu@irell.com Zachariah Bo Summers zsummers@irell.com Dated: June 18, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?