Montoya, et al v City of San Jose, et al

Filing 114

SCHEDULING ORDER re 113 . Jury Selection set for 9/9/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Pretrial Conference set for 9/2/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/14/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 Anthony Boskovich, No. 121198 Boskovich & Appleton 2 28 N. First Street, 6th Floor San Jose, California 95113-1210 3 policemisconduct@compuserve.com 4 (408) 286-5150 5 Attorney for plaintiff GERARDO MONTOYA 6 Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 286-5150 7 8 9 10 11 12 GERARDO MONTOYA, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF SAN JOSE; ROBERT DAVIS, ) individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police ) for the City of San Jose; OFFICER CRUZADO, ) BADGE NO. 3780, a San Jose police officer; ) SERGEANT ASATO, BADGE NO. 3047, ) individually and in his capacity as a San Jose ) police sergeant; OFFICER T. ROGERS, a San ) Jose police officer; DETECTIVE BARRARAH, ) a San Jose police officer; SERGEANT FERLA, ) individually and in his capacity as a San Jose ) police sergeant; SERGEANT ZOLO ) DOLEZAR, BADGE NO. 2010, individually and ) in his capacity as a San Jose police sergeant; ) SERGEANT DAVE NEWMAN, BADGE NO. ) 2119, individually and in his capacity as a San ) Jose police sergeant; SEGEANT CRESCINI, ) BADGE NO. 2326, individually and in his ) capacity as a San Jose police sergeant; ) SERGEANT MARSH COOK, BADGE NO. ) 3050, individually and in his capacity as a San Jose ) police sergeant; SERGEANT SOLOMON, ) BADGE NO. 3773, individually and in his ) capacity as a San Jose police sergeant; ) SERGEANT SHAWNY WILLIAMS, ) individually and in her capacity as a San Jose ) police sergeant; SERGEANT GUTIERREZ, ) individually and in his capacity as a San Jose ) Plaintiff, No. CV-08-820 JF ---R---P---S-E---] SCHEDULING [P-- O - O - - D O RDER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 28 [Proposed] Scheduling Order Page 1 Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 286-5150 1 police sergeant; SERGEANT SHIELDS, individually and in his capacity as a San Jose 2 police sergeant; DETECTIVE ERIC GRIMES, BADGE NO. 2690, a San Jose police officer; 3 DETECTIVE TIM URETA, BADGE NO. 2985, a San Jose police officer; DETECTIVE STAN 4 MCFADDEN, BADGE NO. 3076, a San Jose police officer; DETECTIVE TOM 5 TIPHAYACHAN, a San Jose police officer; "BOSS COMMANDER", BADGE NO. 2301, 6 a San Jose police officer whose true name is unknown to plaintiff and who may have been a 7 command level officer; OFFICER NASCIMIENTO, BADGE NO. 3057, a San Jose 8 police officer; OFFICER FINO, BADGE NO. 2118, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER 9 PATRINOS, BADGE NO. 2154, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER DUNSON, BADGE 10 NO. 2790, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER MARTINEZ, BADGE NO. 2836, a San Jose 11 police officer; OFFICER WEST, BADGE NO. 2943, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER 12 MOSTO, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER LIBBY, BADGE NO. 3063, a San Jose police 13 officer; OFFICER WOLOSZEZ, BADGE NO. 3223, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER JOUST, 14 BADGE NO. 3237, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER KNIGHT, BADGE NO. 3461, a San 15 Jose police officer; OFFICER TRUDO, BADGE NO. 3451, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER 16 GERBRANDT, BADGE NO. 3533, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER MORO, BADGE NO. 17 3637, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER KWONG, BADGE NO. 3200, a San Jose police 18 officer; OFFICER YOUNG, BADGE NO. 3725, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER ORUM, 19 BADGE NO. 3745, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER HIGGINS, BADGE NO. 3887, a San 20 Jose police officer; OFFICER CARDIN, BADGE NO. 3846, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER 21 SANCHEZ, BADGE NO. 7929, a San Jose police officer; OFFICER DARIO, a San Jose police 22 officer; UNKNOWN OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2050, an Hispanic San Jose police officer with 23 glasses whose name is unknown to plaintiff; UNKNOWN OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2462, an 24 Hispanic San Jose police officer whose name is unknown to plaintiff; UNKNOWN OFFICER, 25 BADGE NO. 2629, an African American San Jose police officer whose name is unknown to plaintiff; 26 JOHN DOE and RICHARD ROE, individually and in their capacities as police officers for the City 27 of San Jose, the identity and number of whom are 28 [Proposed] Scheduling Order ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 2 1 unknown to plaintiff; DOES 1 through 200, ) Defendants. ) 2 __________________________________________) 3 4 The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, Michael Groves for 5 Defendants and Anthony Boskovich for Plaintiff, hereby stipulate and propose the following 6 scheduling order for this matter: Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 286-5150 7 8 Expert Disclosures due: 9 Close of Fact Discovery: 10 Close of Expert Discovery: 11 Last Day for Dispositive Motions: 12 Pretrial Conference: 13 Jury Selection: 14 Jury Trial (10 days): 15 16 Dated: 3 April 2010 17 18 19 20 Dated: 7 April 2010 21 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 [Proposed] Scheduling Order Page 3 July 15, 2011 July 29, 2011 August 5, 2011 August 12, 2011 September 2, 2011 at 11:00 A.M. September 9, 2011 at 1:30 P.M. September 12, 2011 /s/ Anthony Boskovich ______________________________ Anthony Boskovich Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Michael Groves ______________________________ Michael Groves Attorney for Defendants 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED 4/14/10 4 Dated: ______________ 5 6 Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 286-5150 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Scheduling Order Page 4 _________________________________________ Judge of the United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?