Spears et al v. Washington Mutual, Inc. et al

Filing 332

ORDER 329 on Stipulation for the Production of Documennts Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/30/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 JOHN M. SORICH (CA Bar No. 125223) jsorich@alvaradosmith.com 2 S. CHRISTOPHER YOO (CA Bar No. 169442) cyoo@alvaradosmith.com 3 JENNY L. MERRIS (CA Bar No. 246088) jmerris@alvaradosmith.com 4 ALVARADOSMITH A Professional Corporation 5 1 MacArthur Place, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 6 Tel: (714) 852-6800 Fax: (714) 852-6899 7 Attorneys for Non-Party 8 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 FELTON A. SPEARS, JR. and SIDNEY 13 SCHOLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 FIRST AMERICAN EAPPRAISEIT (a/k/a 17 eAppraiseIT, LLC), a Delaware limited liability company, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:08-CV-00868 (RMW) CLASS ACTION [] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 502 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -13651777.1 -- AL109.3023 [] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 502 (Case No. 5:08-CV-00868 RMW) 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: 2 Having considered the Stipulation submitted by the Parties, by and through their counsel of 3 record, regarding the production of documents pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 502, and 4 good cause appearing: 5 PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 DATED: HON. Ronald M. Whyte U.S. District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -23651777.1 -- AL109.3023 [] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 502 (Case No. 5:08-CV-00868 RMW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?