Acer, Inc. et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Filing
285
ORDER VACATING MARKMAN HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on April 28, 2011. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)
1
2
**E-Filed 4/28/2011**
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA
CORPORATION and GATEWAY, INC.
Case No. 5:08-cv-00877 JF/HRL
Plaintiffs,
v.
17
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES
LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC
CORPORATION, and ALLIACENSE
LIMITED,
18
Defendants.
__________________________________
19
HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA,
INC.,
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case No. 5:08-cv-00882 JF/HRL
Plaintiffs,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES
LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC
CORPORATION, and ALLIACENSE
LIMITED,
Defendants.
26
27
28
Case Nos. 5:08-cv-00877-JF/HRL; 5:08-cv-00882-JF/HRL; 5:08-cv-05398-JF/HRL
ORDER VACATING MARKMAN HEARING
(JFEX1)
1
2
BARCO N.V., a Belgian Corporation
3
Case No. 5:08-cv-05398 JF/HRL
Plaintiff,
v.
4
ORDER1 VACATING MARKMAN
HEARING
5
6
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD.,
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP.,
ALLIACENSE LTD.,
7
8
Defendants.
____________________________________
9
10
In light of the oral arguments and moving papers submitted in connection with
11
Defendants’ motions to amend infringement contentions for U.S. Patent Nos. 5,530,890 (“the
12
‘890 patent”) and 5,440,749 (“the ‘749 patent”), it appears that the motions must be granted at
13
least in part. Accordingly, the Markman hearing scheduled for May 10, 2011, will be vacated in
14
order to allow time for supplemental briefing. The Court will issue a reasoned disposition and
15
revised case management order shortly.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
DATED: April 28, 2011
___________________________
JEREMY FOGEL
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports
2
Case Nos. 5:08-cv-00877-JF/HRL; 5:08-cv-00882-JF/HRL; 5:08-cv-05398-JF/HRL
ORDER VACATING MARKMAN HEARING
(JFLC1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?