HTC Corporation et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al

Filing 709

ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 21, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 5:08-cv-00882-PSG ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT (Re: Docket No. 674) (X) Jury Verdict. This action came before the court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the jury verdict filed 20 21 22 23 24 October 3, 2013, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to the court’s order dismissing U.S. Patent No. 5,530,890 (“the ’890 patent”) entered September 19, 2013 (Docket No. 594), judgment with respect to the ’890 patent is entered as follows: 25 26 27 28 a) Because Defendants cannot establish entitlement to damages in the present action based on the court’s summary judgment order (issued on September 17, 2013 (Docket No. 585)), the court on September 19, 2013 DISMISSED the Fifth Claim for Relief in HTC’s First Amended Complaint (seeking a declaration that HTC does not infringe any valid and enforceable claim of the ’890 patent), and Count IV of Defendants’ Answer and 1 Case No. 5:08-cv-00882-PSG ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?