HTC Corporation et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Filing
709
ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 21, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, )
INC.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 5:08-cv-00882-PSG
ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT
(Re: Docket No. 674)
(X) Jury Verdict. This action came before the court for a trial by jury. The issues
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the jury verdict filed
20
21
22
23
24
October 3, 2013, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to the court’s order dismissing U.S. Patent
No. 5,530,890 (“the ’890 patent”) entered September 19, 2013 (Docket No. 594), judgment with
respect to the ’890 patent is entered as follows:
25
26
27
28
a) Because Defendants cannot establish entitlement to damages in the present action based on
the court’s summary judgment order (issued on September 17, 2013 (Docket No. 585)), the
court on September 19, 2013 DISMISSED the Fifth Claim for Relief in HTC’s
First Amended Complaint (seeking a declaration that HTC does not infringe any valid and
enforceable claim of the ’890 patent), and Count IV of Defendants’ Answer and
1
Case No. 5:08-cv-00882-PSG
ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?