Asustek Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Limited et al

Filing 78

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/23/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 William Sloan Coats (SBN 98464) Mark R. Weinstein (SBN 193043) Mark F. Lambert (SBN 197410) Kyle D. Chen (SBN 239501) White & Case LLP 3000 El Camino Real Five Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor Palo Alto, California 94306 Tel. 650.213.0300 Fax 650.213.8158 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL and ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. (Case No. C 08 00884) Charles T. Hoge, (SBN 110696) Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel.: (619) 231-8666 Fax: (619) 231-9593 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION Robert E. Krebs (SBN 57526) Christoper L. Ogden (SBN 235517) Nixon Peabody LLP 200 Page Miii Road, 2nd Floor Palo Alto, CA 94305--2022 Tel.: 650.320.7700 Fax: 650.320.7701 Ronald F. Lopez (SBN 11756) Sushila Chanana (SBN 254100) Nixon Peabody LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111--3600 Tel.: 415.984.8200 Fax: 415.984.8300 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, MCM PORTFOLIO LLC, and ALLIACENSE LIMITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 V. SAN JOSE DIVISION ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, Case No. C 0800884 JF (related to C 08 00877 JF and C 08 00882) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(2) AND --------P---S--D- ORDER THEREON IPRO - O -E--I TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and ALLIACENSE LIMITED, Defendants. 2387952 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 08-00884 iF (and related cases) WHEREAS all matters in controversy between plaintiffs ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. and 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ 25 26 27 28 --1-- 2387952 Asus Computer International (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and defendants Technology Properties Limited, Patriot Scientific Corporation, MCM Portfolio, LLC, and Alliacense Limited (collectively, "Defendants") have been settled; WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court order, as follows: (1) All claims asserted by Plaintiffs and all counterclaims asserted by Defendants in this action shall be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); (2) Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B) does not apply to the dismissal of this action nor to the dismissal of the pending and related actions in the Eastern District of Texas (case nos. 2:08-cv174, 175, 177, and 227); and (3) All attorneys' fees and costs shall be borne by the party that incurred them. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: February 9, 2009 WHITE & CASE LLP By: Is! Mark R. Weinstein Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: February 9, 2009 NIXON PEABODY LLP By: /sI Ronald F. Lopez Attorneys for TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, MCM PORTFOLIO LLC, and ALLIACENSE LIMITED Dated: February 9, 2009 Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge Charles H. Hoge Attorneys for PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 08-00884 iF (and related cases) PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. Date: ________________________ 2/23/09 _________________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Sushila Chanana, am the ECF User whose ID and password is being used to file this STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(2) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mark Weinstein and Charges Hoge have concurred in this filing and that I will keep their electronic signature on file 2387952 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 08-00882 iF (and related cases)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?