Fox v. Piche et al

Filing 80

ORDER MODIFYING SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 ORDER re 76 Letter filed by Richard B. Fox. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-FILED 11/13/08* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARD B. FOX, M.D., v. Plaintiff, NO. C 08-1098 RS ORDER MODIFYING SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 ORDER WILLIAM PICHE, et al., Defendants. / The September 22, 2008 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss and to Strike at 6:22-23 originally said: "Fox filed this suit against defendants on March 18, 2008, so any claim that accrued before March 18, 2004, would otherwise be time-barred unless a new injury intervened." The Court hereby modifies that sentence of the order to read: "Fox filed this suit on February 19, 2008, so any claim that accrued before February 19, 2004, would otherwise be timebarred unless a new injury intervened." IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/13/08 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO: Beth Ann Rains McGowen James A. Hennefer Joseph H. C. Wood Michael A. Hurwitz Samantha L Reardon beth.mcgowen@bingham.com, jerry.webb@bingham.com jhennefer@hennefer-wood.com jhcwlaw@yahoo.com mahlaw@sbcglobal.net samantha.reardon@bingham.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 11/13/08 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Chambers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?