Roylance v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al

Filing 115

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/4/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: November 4, 2008 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge The parties have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case be dismissed with prejudice. However, if any party notifies the Court within ninety days of the date of this order that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. GERALD ROYLANCE, Plaintiff, V. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, Defendant. ________________________/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CV-08-1101-JF ORDER OF DISMISSAL