Tavares et al v. Duran Hogan Construction et al
Filing
22
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/1/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)
Tavares et al v. Duran Hogan Construction et al
Doc. 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
** E-filed March 1, 2011 **
NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RICHARDO TAVARES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DURAN HOGAN CONSTRUCTION, et al., No. C08-01277 HRL ORDER OF DISMISSAL [Re: Docket No. 20] Defendants. ____________________________________/ Mediator Charles S. Loughran advised the Court in December 2008 that the parties reached a settlement in the above-entitled action. Docket No. 20. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. However, if any party certifies to this court, no later than March 15, 2011, with proof of service of a copy on the other party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered or that the settlement has not been consummated as agreed, the foregoing ORDER SHALL STAND VACATED and this cause shall be restored to the calendar and be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
For the Northern District of California
Dated: March 1, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C08-01277 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Adam Wang Paul Vincent Simpson Timothy Patrick O'Donnell adamqwang@gmail.com, alpedersen@gmail.com, rosilenda@gmail.com psimpson@sgijlaw.com, Diana@sgijlaw.com, TOdonnell@sgijlaw.com todonnell@sgilaw.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
For the Northern District of California
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?