Bush v. Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety
Filing
184
ORDER Denying 180 Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Prior Statements. Noticed motion hearing vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/22/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)
1
*E-FILED: February 22, 2012*
2
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
No. C08-01354 LHK (HRL)
JAMES ALAN BUSH,
12
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF
PRIOR STATEMENTS
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY, et al.,
15
[Re: Docket No. 180]
Defendants.
/
16
17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(C), plaintiff James Alan Bush moves for an order
18
compelling the County Public Defender’s Office (Office) to produce statements that it
19
reportedly made about the instant lawsuit.1 That rule, however, provides that a party may obtain
20
his or her own prior statements about an action or its subject matter. Moreover, although Bush
21
says that he is seeking to have a prior order of dismissal vacated, the fact remains that the Office
22
is not a party to this action. In any event, it appears that this case has not progressed to the
23
point where plaintiff would be entitled to take discovery from any source. FED. R. CIV. P.
24
26(d)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied.
SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: February 22, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
27
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
The matter is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument, and
the noticed motion hearing is vacated. CIV. L.R. 7-1(b).
1
1
5:08-cv-01354-LHK Notice sent by U.S. Mail to:
2
James Alan Bush
471 East Julian Street
San Jose, CA 95112
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?