Ashman v. Solectron Corporation et al
Filing
90
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 83 Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/21/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM A. ASHMAN CASE NO. 5:08-cv-01430JF Plaintiffs), v. SOLECTRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s).
/
-------------STIPULATION AND -[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: / Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with
Vivien B. Williamson, 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 520, Oakland, CA 94612,
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) / other requested deadline July 31,2009
Dated: S'A^-0^
Dated: c5"-^-^f
_
Attorney Tor Plaintiff
_, ^/
Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation XX Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order, XX other July 31, 2009
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
5/21/09 ----------------UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?