Rodriguez v. First Franklin Financial Corporation

Filing 213

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT; SETTING DEADLINE FOR FURTHER STATUS REPORT re 212 Status Report. Status Report due by 6/21/2010. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/26/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] N D IS T IC T R OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re First Franklin Financial Corp. Litigation No. C 08-01515 JW (HRL) ORDER ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT; SETTING DEADLINE FOR FURTHER STATUS REPORT The court is in receipt of the parties Joint Status Report and Request for Additional Time to Attempt to Mediate Final Settlement Terms. After reviewing same, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline of May 24, 2010 for the parties to file their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and the hearing scheduled for June 7, 2010 are vacated. ... ... A Interim Lead Counsel ER C LI FO BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. Andrew S. Friedman (admitted pro hac vice) Wendy J. Harrison (CA SBN 151090) 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Tel: (602) 274-1100 Fax: (602) 274-1199 E-mail: afriedman@bffb.com wharrison@bffb.com UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will file a status report on or before June 21, 2010, advising the court of the status of the settlement agreement. DATED: _________ Dated: May 26, 2010 __________________________ JAMES WARE United States District Judge Honorable James Ware 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?