Espinoza et al v. C & C Security Patrol, Inc. et al

Filing 70

ORDER re 63 Defendants' Motion for Hearing re Motion to Compel Plaintiffs' Depositions. Plaintiffs' opposition due 12/1/2009. Defendants' reply due 12/8/2009. Unless otherwise ordered, matter to be deemed submitted without oral argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/19/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LEONARDO ESPINOZA and SERGIO ROQUE, v. Plaintiffs, No. C08-01522 JW (HRL) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR HEARING RE MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' DEPOSITIONS *E-FILED 11-19-2009*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

C&C SECURITY PATROL, INC. HERMENEGILDO COUGH, MARCEL LOPEZ, GILBERT MARTINEZ, Defendants. /

Defendants seek leave to file a belated motion to compel plaintiffs' depositions (Docket No. 63). Having considered the request, this court orders as follows: 1. 2. This court will accept defendants' belated November 3, 2009 motion to compel. No later than December 1, 2009, plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the

discovery relief sought by defendants. 3. 4. Defendants' reply shall be filed no later than December 8, 2009. Unless otherwise ordered, this court will deem the matter submitted on the

papers without oral argument. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2009 HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5:08-cv-01522-JW Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam Wang [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] Mark A. Hagopian [e-mail] Sejal Thakkar [e-mail] Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2