Fee v. State Of California et al

Filing 60

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 53 Motion to Shorten Time and setting briefing schedule, and addressing briefing on Motion to Seal. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SANDRA J. FEE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, OFFICER B. RIOUX, OFFICER VOORHEES, et al. Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. C-08-01549 RMW ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND TO CONTINUE TRIAL [Re Docket No. 53 ] E-filed on: 4/27/09

On April 23, 2009, defendants filed three motions with the court: 1) a Motion to Amend Case Management Schedule and Continue Trial due to the unavailability of Officer Rioux, 2) a Motion to Shorten Notice for Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial and Modify Scheduling Order so that the motion could be heard on May 8, 2009, and 3) a Motion to File Document Under Seal in connection with the first motion. Due to the proposed abbreviated time, the court's staff contacted plaintiff's counsel to determine if plaintiff would be opposing the motions. Plaintiff's counsel stated that plaintiff will oppose the motion to amend the case management schedule and the motion to seal, but does not oppose the motion to shorten time for the hearing. Accordingly, defendant's Motion to Shorten Notice for Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial and Modify Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The motion will be heard on May 8, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.
ORDER SHORTENING TIME No. C-08-1549 RMW TER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff's opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than May 1, 2009. Defendant's reply papers, if any, shall be filed and served no later than Tuesday, May 5, 2009. With regard to the motion to seal, counsel are encouraged to meet and confer to determine if the motion to file under seal may be resolved by stipulation of the parties. Absent such stipulation, plaintiff's opposition to the motion to seal shall be filed and served on or before Wednesday, April 29, 2009, in conformance with Civil Local Rule 7-11(b).

DATED:

4/27/09

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

ORDER SHORTENING TIME No. C-08-1549 RMW TER

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for plaintiff: George J. Kovacevich [e-mail]

Counsel for defendants who have appeared: Jeffrey Richard Vincent [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated:

4/27/09

TER Chambers of Judge Whyte

ORDER SHORTENING TIME No. C-08-1549 RMW TER

3