Dish Network L.L.C. et al v. SatFTA
Filing
64
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on May 13, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
**E-Filed 5/13/2011**
DLA PIPER US LLP
ROY K. MCDONALD, Bar No. 193691
roy.mcdonald@dlapiper.com
STEVE CHIARI, Bar No. 221410
stephen.chiari@dlapiper.com
DAVID M. DOYLE, Bar No. 233439
david.doyle@dlapiper.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415.836.2500
Fax: 415.836.2501
HAGAN NOLL & BOYLE LLC
CHAD M. HAGAN (pro hac vice)
chad.hagan@hnbllc.com
CHRISTINE D. HAGAN (pro hac vice)
christine.hagan@hnbllc.com
Two Memorial City Plaza
820 Gessner, Suite 940
Houston, Texas 77024
Tel: 713.343.0478
Fax: 713.758.0146
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DISH NETWORK L.L.C., ECHOSTAR
TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C. and
NAGRASTAR L.L.C.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DISH NETWORK L.L.C., a Colorado
Limited Liability Company, ECHOSTAR
TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C., a Texas Limited
Liability Company, and NAGRASTAR
L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability
Company,
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. 08 CV 01561 JF (PSG)
---------------------------------- PERMANENT
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
v.
SatFTA aka SERGEI ALEX ALEXEYEV,
Defendant.
26
27
28
---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
1
This Court, having determined that a permanent injunction should issue against
2
Defendant for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order Granting Summary Judgment Against
3
Defendant (Dkt. No. 53), hereby ORDERS that:
4
(1)
Defendant and any of his officers, agents, servants, employees, and those acting in
5
active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Order are
6
PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from engaging in the following conduct:
7
a.
Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining or assisting in the making
8
or maintaining of an unauthorized connection or connections, whether
9
physically, electrically, electronically, or inductively, to DISH Network’s
10
encrypted satellite signal, or any other component of DISH Network’s
11
encrypted satellite signal, or to a cable, wire, or other media, or receiver
12
that is attached to DISH Network’s satellite signal, DISH Network’s
13
satellite system, DISH Network’s conditional access system (“CAS”), or
14
any part or component thereof (collectively “DISH Network’s Satellite
15
Signal or Security System”);
16
b.
Knowingly and willfully purchasing, possessing, attaching, causing to be
17
attached, or maintaining or assisting in the purchasing, possessing,
18
attaching, causing to be attached, or maintaining of the attachment of any
19
unauthorized device or devices to any cable, wire, or other component of
20
DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or Security system, or to a cable, wire, or
21
other media, or receiver that is attached to DISH Network’s Satellite
22
Signal or Security System;
23
c.
Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining or assisting in the making
24
or maintaining of any modification or alteration to any device installed
25
without the authorization of DISH Network for purposes of using said
26
device to intercept or decrypt DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or
27
circumvent DISH Network’s Security System;
28
1
---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
1
d.
Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining any modifications or
2
alterations or assisting in the making or maintaining of any modifications
3
or alterations to any access device that authorizes services intended to
4
obtain DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or any DISH Network service;
5
e.
Knowingly and willfully obtaining or assisting in the obtaining of any
6
unauthorized access device and/or using or assisting in using any
7
modified, altered, or unauthorized access device intended to obtain DISH
8
Network’s Satellite Signal or any DISH Network service;
9
f.
Knowingly
and
willfully
manufacturing,
importing,
assembling,
10
distributing, selling, offering to sell, possessing, advertising for sale, or
11
otherwise providing or assisting in manufacturing, importing, assembling,
12
distributing, selling, offering to sell, possessing, advertising for sale or
13
otherwise providing any device, plan or kit for a device or for a printed
14
circuit, designed in whole or in part to decode, descramble, intercept, or
15
otherwise make intelligible any encoded, scrambled, or otherwise
16
nonstandard signal broadcasted by DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or
17
carried by DISH Network’s services;
18
g.
Intercepting, without authorization, or assisting others in intercepting, any
19
interstate or foreign communication broadcasted by DISH Network’s
20
Satellite Signal or carried by DISH Network’s services;
21
h.
Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining an unauthorized
22
connection or connections, whether physically, electrically, or inductively
23
to a television set or to other equipment designed to receive television
24
broadcast or transmission for the purpose of intercepting, receiving, or
25
using any program or other service carried by DISH Network which
26
Defendant is not authorized to receive or use;
27
28
i.
Knowingly and willfully purchasing, possessing, attaching, causing to be
attached, assisting other in or maintaining the attachment of any
2
---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
1
unauthorized device or devices to a television set or to other equipment
2
designed to receive a television broadcast or transmission for the purpose
3
of intercepting, receiving, or using any program or other service carried by
4
DISH Network which Defendant is not authorized to receive or use;
5
j.
Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining any modification or
6
alteration to any device installed with the authorization of DISH Network
7
for the purpose of intercepting, receiving, or using any program or other
8
service carried by DISH Network which Defendant is not authorized to
9
receive or use;
10
k.
11
12
Circumventing, or assisting others in circumventing, DISH Network’s
CAS;
l.
Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise
13
trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part
14
thereof, that:
15
(i)
16
is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing
DISH Network’s CAS;
17
(ii)
18
has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other
than to circumvent DISH Network’s CAS, or
19
(iii)
is marketed by Defendant or another acting in concert with
20
Defendant with Defendant’s knowledge for use in circumventing
21
DISH Network’s CAS;
22
m.
Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise
23
trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part
24
thereof, that:
25
(i)
is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing
26
a technological measure that effectively protects the programming
27
broadcast by DISH Network from unauthorized copying and/or
28
distribution,
3
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
----------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
(ii)
has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other
2
than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively
3
protects the programming broadcast by DISH Network from
4
unauthorized copying and/or distribution, or
5
(iii)
is marketed by Defendant or another acting in concert with
6
Defendant with Defendant’s knowledge for use in circumventing a
7
technological measure that effectively protects the programming
8
broadcast by DISH Network from unauthorized copying and/or
9
distribution;
10
n.
11
Reverse engineering or assisting in the reverse engineering of DISH
Network’s CAS, or any portion thereof; and
12
o.
Distributing or publishing or assisting in the distributing or publishing to
13
any third party, without Plaintiffs’ prior written consent, information,
14
instructions, descriptions, diagrams, or illustrations regarding DISH
15
Network’s Security System or any portion thereof.
16
(2)
This Permanent Injunction takes effect immediately.
17
(3)
Should Defendant breach any part of this Permanent Injunction he shall be subject
18
---------------------to damages in the amounnt of of up to $110,000 for each such breach or violation, which is the
19
maximum statutory damages permitted per violation under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)-(ii). For
20
purposes of assessing damages under this section, each “device, product, file, technology
21
or part or component thereof” that is distributed by Defendant or others acting in active
22
participation or concert with Defendant in violation of this Permanent Injunction shall constitute
23
a separate and discrete violation. In the case of any software, firmware or other file distributed
24
or posted by Defendant or others acting in active participation or concert with Defendant,
25
each time that software, firmware, or other file is downloaded by an end-user shall constitute
26
a separate and discrete violation for purposes of quantifying damages set forth in this section.
27
28
4
-----------------------------[AMENDED PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
DATED: May 13, 2011
__________________________________
JEREMY FOGEL
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
-----------------------------PERMANENT INJUNCTION
[AMENDED PROPOSED]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?