Dish Network L.L.C. et al v. SatFTA

Filing 64

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on May 13, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 **E-Filed 5/13/2011** DLA PIPER US LLP ROY K. MCDONALD, Bar No. 193691 roy.mcdonald@dlapiper.com STEVE CHIARI, Bar No. 221410 stephen.chiari@dlapiper.com DAVID M. DOYLE, Bar No. 233439 david.doyle@dlapiper.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415.836.2500 Fax: 415.836.2501 HAGAN NOLL & BOYLE LLC CHAD M. HAGAN (pro hac vice) chad.hagan@hnbllc.com CHRISTINE D. HAGAN (pro hac vice) christine.hagan@hnbllc.com Two Memorial City Plaza 820 Gessner, Suite 940 Houston, Texas 77024 Tel: 713.343.0478 Fax: 713.758.0146 12 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DISH NETWORK L.L.C., ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C. and NAGRASTAR L.L.C. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DISH NETWORK L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability Company, ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Company, and NAGRASTAR L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 08 CV 01561 JF (PSG) ---------------------------------- PERMANENT [AMENDED PROPOSED] INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT v. SatFTA aka SERGEI ALEX ALEXEYEV, Defendant. 26 27 28 ---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION [AMENDED PROPOSED] 1 This Court, having determined that a permanent injunction should issue against 2 Defendant for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order Granting Summary Judgment Against 3 Defendant (Dkt. No. 53), hereby ORDERS that: 4 (1) Defendant and any of his officers, agents, servants, employees, and those acting in 5 active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Order are 6 PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from engaging in the following conduct: 7 a. Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining or assisting in the making 8 or maintaining of an unauthorized connection or connections, whether 9 physically, electrically, electronically, or inductively, to DISH Network’s 10 encrypted satellite signal, or any other component of DISH Network’s 11 encrypted satellite signal, or to a cable, wire, or other media, or receiver 12 that is attached to DISH Network’s satellite signal, DISH Network’s 13 satellite system, DISH Network’s conditional access system (“CAS”), or 14 any part or component thereof (collectively “DISH Network’s Satellite 15 Signal or Security System”); 16 b. Knowingly and willfully purchasing, possessing, attaching, causing to be 17 attached, or maintaining or assisting in the purchasing, possessing, 18 attaching, causing to be attached, or maintaining of the attachment of any 19 unauthorized device or devices to any cable, wire, or other component of 20 DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or Security system, or to a cable, wire, or 21 other media, or receiver that is attached to DISH Network’s Satellite 22 Signal or Security System; 23 c. Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining or assisting in the making 24 or maintaining of any modification or alteration to any device installed 25 without the authorization of DISH Network for purposes of using said 26 device to intercept or decrypt DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or 27 circumvent DISH Network’s Security System; 28 1 ---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION [AMENDED PROPOSED] 1 d. Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining any modifications or 2 alterations or assisting in the making or maintaining of any modifications 3 or alterations to any access device that authorizes services intended to 4 obtain DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or any DISH Network service; 5 e. Knowingly and willfully obtaining or assisting in the obtaining of any 6 unauthorized access device and/or using or assisting in using any 7 modified, altered, or unauthorized access device intended to obtain DISH 8 Network’s Satellite Signal or any DISH Network service; 9 f. Knowingly and willfully manufacturing, importing, assembling, 10 distributing, selling, offering to sell, possessing, advertising for sale, or 11 otherwise providing or assisting in manufacturing, importing, assembling, 12 distributing, selling, offering to sell, possessing, advertising for sale or 13 otherwise providing any device, plan or kit for a device or for a printed 14 circuit, designed in whole or in part to decode, descramble, intercept, or 15 otherwise make intelligible any encoded, scrambled, or otherwise 16 nonstandard signal broadcasted by DISH Network’s Satellite Signal or 17 carried by DISH Network’s services; 18 g. Intercepting, without authorization, or assisting others in intercepting, any 19 interstate or foreign communication broadcasted by DISH Network’s 20 Satellite Signal or carried by DISH Network’s services; 21 h. Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining an unauthorized 22 connection or connections, whether physically, electrically, or inductively 23 to a television set or to other equipment designed to receive television 24 broadcast or transmission for the purpose of intercepting, receiving, or 25 using any program or other service carried by DISH Network which 26 Defendant is not authorized to receive or use; 27 28 i. Knowingly and willfully purchasing, possessing, attaching, causing to be attached, assisting other in or maintaining the attachment of any 2 ---------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION [AMENDED PROPOSED] 1 unauthorized device or devices to a television set or to other equipment 2 designed to receive a television broadcast or transmission for the purpose 3 of intercepting, receiving, or using any program or other service carried by 4 DISH Network which Defendant is not authorized to receive or use; 5 j. Knowingly and willfully making or maintaining any modification or 6 alteration to any device installed with the authorization of DISH Network 7 for the purpose of intercepting, receiving, or using any program or other 8 service carried by DISH Network which Defendant is not authorized to 9 receive or use; 10 k. 11 12 Circumventing, or assisting others in circumventing, DISH Network’s CAS; l. Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise 13 trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part 14 thereof, that: 15 (i) 16 is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing DISH Network’s CAS; 17 (ii) 18 has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent DISH Network’s CAS, or 19 (iii) is marketed by Defendant or another acting in concert with 20 Defendant with Defendant’s knowledge for use in circumventing 21 DISH Network’s CAS; 22 m. Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise 23 trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part 24 thereof, that: 25 (i) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing 26 a technological measure that effectively protects the programming 27 broadcast by DISH Network from unauthorized copying and/or 28 distribution, 3 [AMENDED PROPOSED] ----------------------------- PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 (ii) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other 2 than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively 3 protects the programming broadcast by DISH Network from 4 unauthorized copying and/or distribution, or 5 (iii) is marketed by Defendant or another acting in concert with 6 Defendant with Defendant’s knowledge for use in circumventing a 7 technological measure that effectively protects the programming 8 broadcast by DISH Network from unauthorized copying and/or 9 distribution; 10 n. 11 Reverse engineering or assisting in the reverse engineering of DISH Network’s CAS, or any portion thereof; and 12 o. Distributing or publishing or assisting in the distributing or publishing to 13 any third party, without Plaintiffs’ prior written consent, information, 14 instructions, descriptions, diagrams, or illustrations regarding DISH 15 Network’s Security System or any portion thereof. 16 (2) This Permanent Injunction takes effect immediately. 17 (3) Should Defendant breach any part of this Permanent Injunction he shall be subject 18 ---------------------to damages in the amounnt of of up to $110,000 for each such breach or violation, which is the 19 maximum statutory damages permitted per violation under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)-(ii). For 20 purposes of assessing damages under this section, each “device, product, file, technology 21 or part or component thereof” that is distributed by Defendant or others acting in active 22 participation or concert with Defendant in violation of this Permanent Injunction shall constitute 23 a separate and discrete violation. In the case of any software, firmware or other file distributed 24 or posted by Defendant or others acting in active participation or concert with Defendant, 25 each time that software, firmware, or other file is downloaded by an end-user shall constitute 26 a separate and discrete violation for purposes of quantifying damages set forth in this section. 27 28 4 -----------------------------[AMENDED PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: May 13, 2011 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 -----------------------------PERMANENT INJUNCTION [AMENDED PROPOSED]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?