Rajkumar v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 82

INTERIM ORDER re 70 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 2/11/09. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 2/11/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion. OR D E R, page 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ANOOP RAJKUMAR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 08-1600 PVT INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF' MO T IO N TO COMPEL
S

On January 8, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant Wipro, Ltd. (" Wipr o" ) to produce documents. 1 Wipro opposed the motion. Having reviewed the papers submitted by the par ties, the court finds it appropriate to issue this interim order. Based on the moving and opposition papers and the file herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than February 23, 2009, Wipro shall serve and file a supplemental brief, along with any appropriate supporting declaration(s), responding to the por tion of Plaintiff' s motion that takes issue with Wipro' s responses to Plaintiff' s Document Request Nos. 6, 7 & 8. (See Docket No. 70, ¶ ¶ 1­5). While the title of Plaintiff' s motion r efer s to an " investigative report," the document requests at issue are not limited to such reports. If Wipro contends it has no documents (whether paper or electronic) in its possession, custody or

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

contr ol that are responsive to any of those requests, it shall submit a declaration describing: 1) the search it did for responsive documents; and 2) what kind of documentation it normally maintains r egarding workers that it " engages" and " assigns" to one of its clients (as it admits in its answer that it did for Plaintiff). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may serve and file a reply to Wipro' s supplemental brief no later than March 13, 2009. Absent further order of the court, Plaintiff' s motion to compel will be deemed submitted without oral argument as of that date. Dated: 2/11/09 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge

OR D E R, page 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 3 CORINNE LEW Cour tr oom Deputy copies mailed on Anoop Rajkumar 4611 Deerwatch Drive Chantilly, VA 20151 to: Counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court' s Electronic Case Filing system.