Shankar v. HSBC, Inc.

Filing 66

ORDER TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE. On or before 9/25/2009, Defendant shall file with the Court and serve Plaintiff referenced right-to-sue letter. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/21/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Prasad Shankar, v. HSBC, Inc., Defendant. / Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-01769 JW ORDER TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 21, 2009, the Court conducted a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (hereafter, "Motion," Docket Item No. 46.) Upon review of the docket, the Court was unable to locate the EEOC right-to-sue letter sent to Plaintiff in relation to the charge filed on July 20, 2007 (EEOC Case No. 556-2007-00787). Defendant references this right-to-sue letter in the Motion, and represents that it was issued to Plaintiff on March 11, 2008. (See Motion at 6 (citing Declaration of Nancy Scott ¶ 21, Exs. I-J, Docket Item No. 50.)) However, the Court does not have a copy of this letter. Thus, on or before September 25, 2009, Defendant shall file with the Court and serve Plaintiff referenced right-to-sue letter. Dated: September 21, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Robert James Wilger rwilger@littler.com Prasad Shankar 2701 East Brookshire, Apt. 201 Sioux Falls, SD 57103 Dated: September 21, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?