Ruiz et al v. Vargas

Filing 79

ORDER granting 78 plaintiffs' request for telephonic appearance at 6/11/2010 settlement conference as to Hernandez Parra, Alejandro Aguilar and Salomon Gomez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/9/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JESUS FELIPE RUIZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMANDO VARGAS, et al., Defendants. / No. C08-01804 PVT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC ATTENDANCE *E-FILED 06-09-2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Plaintiffs Ramiro Hernandez Parra, Alejandro Aguilar and Salomon Gomez are excused from appearing in person at the June 11, 2010 settlement conference. They shall, however, be available by telephone for the duration of the conference at a location that accepts faxes. Additionally, prior to the conference, plaintiffs' counsel shall secure written authorization to settle this matter on their behalf and shall bring those documents to the conference. SO ORDERED. June 9, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:08-cv-01804-PVT Notice has been electronically mailed to: Amy Richelle Carlson Douglas M. Larsen Edward F. Cullen Jacob William Sider amy@calemploy.com larsen@flgz.net ecullen@wpclaw.com jacobsider@gmail.com daniels@flgz.net margainlaw@hotmail.com, jl.jdblaw@earthlink.net Joshua Stephen Daniels Tomas Eduardo Margain Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?