Ruiz et al v. Vargas

Filing 89

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re 88 Stipulation filed by Edith R Sauno. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on October 12, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2010)

Ruiz et al v. Vargas

Doc. 89

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Tomas E. Margain, Bar No. 193555 DAL BON & MARGAIN
28 NORTH 1ST STREET, SUITE 210 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL [phone] FAX [phone]

[e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Amy Carlson Williams, Pinelli & Cullen 110 N. 3rd St. San Jose, CA 95113 P: 408-288-3868 F: 408-288-3860 Attorneys for Defendant EDITH SAUNO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case No.: 08-CV-01804PVT JOSE FELIPE RUIZ; CARLOS AGUILAR RIVAS; MARCELINO HERNANDEZ; ALEJANDRO AGUILAR; RAMIRO HERNANDEZ PARRA; SALOMON GOMEZ; STIPULATION CONTINUING TRIAL MAURO HERNANDEZ; HERIBERTO AND PRETRAIL CONFERENCE AND XXXXXXXXX PAMAZ-LUCAS; ANTONIO HERNANDEZ; [PROPOSED] ORDER ANTONIO GONZALES; and ALEJANDRO GONZALES, Plaintiffs, vs. ARMANDO VARGAS; JAVIER VARGAS; NOE VARGAS; EDITH R. SAUNO; Defendants

-101804 PVT Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas

08-CV-

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

The parties submit the following Stipulation, to continue the trial and all trial setting deadlines 90 days, based on the following factors: 1. Defendant Edith Sauno's counsel has filed a Motion to withdraw as counsel of

record based on an inability to contact her client. The motion is to be heard on October 19, 2010. 2. Based on the last conversations between the parties, a settlement was near and it

is anticipated that when Defense counsel contacts her client the parties will be able to attempt to settle the matter. 3. It appears that the Court may be unavailable for the October 25, 2010 and a

continuance would allow the Court and the parties to determine if this Department will conduct the trial.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. That the trial in this matter be continued 90 days.

FOR PLAINTIFFS

DAL BON & MARGAIN

DATED:

October 8, 2010

By: //s// Tomas E. Margain Tomas E. Margain

FOR DEFENDANT EDITH SAUNO DATED: October 8, 2010 By: //s// Amy Carlson Amy Carlson

-201804 PVT Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas

08-CV-

1 2 3 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and Good Cause shown the trial in this matter is 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED:_________________________
October 12, 2010 1/31/2011

ORDER

continued to ____ and all pretrial orders are continued 90 days.

Pre-trial conference will be held on January 4, 2011 at 2PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED

___________________________________ Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-301804 PVT Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas

08-CV-