Ruiz et al v. Vargas

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT ARMANDO VARGAS re 93 Stipulation filed by Armando Vargas. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on November 5, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

Ruiz et al v. Vargas

Doc. 94

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Tomas E. Margain, Bar No. 193555 DAL BON & MARGAIN 28 North 1st Street, Suite 210 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Douglas M. Larsen, Bar No. 142852 Travis R. Stokes, Bar No. 225122 FISHMAN, LARSEN, GOLDRING & ZEITLER 7112 North Fresno Street, Suite 450 Fresno, CA 93720 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant, ARMANDO VARGAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No.: 08-CV-01804PVT JOSE FELIPE RUIZ; CARLOS AGUILAR RIVAS; MARCELINO HERNANDEZ; ALEJANDRO AGUILAR; RAMIRO XXXXXXXXXX HERNANDEZ PARRA; SALOMON GOMEZ; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] MAURO HERNANDEZ; HERIBERTO ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT PAMAZ-LUCAS; ANTONIO HERNANDEZ; ARMANDO VARGAS ANTONIO GONZALES; and ALEJANDRO GONZALES, Plaintiffs, vs. ARMANDO VARGAS; JAVIER VARGAS; NOE VARGAS; EDITH R. SAUNO; Defendants. And related cross-action,

-1Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas 08-CV-01804 PVT

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Plaintiffs JOSE FELIPE RUIZ, CARLOS AGUILAR RIVAS, MARCELINO HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRO AGUILAR, RAMIRO HERNANDEZ PARRA, SALOMON GOMEZ, MAURO HERNANDEZ, HERIBERTO PAMAZ-LUCAS, ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, ANTONIO GONZALES, and ALEJANDRO GONZALES and Defendant ARMANDO VARGAS through Counsel hereby stipulate as follows: 1. 2. On April 3, 2008, Plaintiffs filed their complaint against ARMANDO VARGAS. On July 30, 2009, Defendant ARMANDO VARGAS filed for bankruptcy

protection (Chapter 7) in the Northern District in an action titled In re Armando Vargas Pena and Martina de Vargas, case number 09-56214. 3. On July 1, 2010, The United States Bankruptcy Court of the Northern District of

California, San Jose Division granted a discharge of ARMANDO VARGAS under section 727 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. 4. Consequently, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the above-named

parties only that the claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiffs in their Second Amended Complaint against Defendant ARMANDO VARGAS in the above-captioned action be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

FOR PLAINTIFFS DATED: November 4, 2010 FOR DEFENDANT ARMANDO VARGAS DATED:

DAL BON & MARGAIN By: //s// Tomas E. Margain Tomas E. Margain FISHMAN, LARSEN, GOLDRING & ZEITLER By: //s//Travis R. Stokes Travis R. Stokes

-2Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas 08-CV-01804 PVT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
November 5, 2010 DATED:_________________________

ORDER Pursuant to the above-Stipulation between the above-named parties and for good cause shown, all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendant ARMANDO VARGAS are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice against Defendant Armando Vargas.

___________________________________ Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-3Ruiz, et al. v. Vargas 08-CV-01804 PVT