Schafer v. Curry et al
Filing
92
STIPULATION AND ORDER 88 to an Accelerated Hearing on Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order re 89 . The stipulation is accepted, except that the court will submit the matter on the filing of plaintiff's opposition. No hearing will be necessary, unless the court determines otherwise. Signed by Judge Whyte on 12/2/2010. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2010)
<![CDATA[
Schafer v. Curry et al
Doc. 92
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AN ACCELERATED SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER --No. C-08-01881 RMW JLR
E-FILED on 12/2/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
DANIEL GENE SCHAFER, Plaintiff, v. BEN CURRY, et al., Defendants.
No. C-08-01881 RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AN ACCELERATED SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER [Re Docket No. 88]
Defendants are moving under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 for a protective order preventing Schafer from taking the deposition of defendant Payne until new counsel is retained by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to represent defendant Payne. The parties agree that an accelerated schedule is necessary to resolve the matter with enough time, if the Court were to deny defendant's motion, for both parties to adequately prepare for the deposition to continue as scheduled for December 15, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. The parties have agreed that plaintiff's opposition will be due December 8, 2010.
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AN ACCELERATED SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER --No. C-08-01881 RMW JLR 2
The stipulation is accepted, except that the court will submit the matter on the filing of plaintiff's opposition. No hearing will be necessary, unless the court determines otherwise.
DATED:
12/2/2010
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
