Schafer v. Curry et al
Filing
95
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 89 Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff shall be entitled to depose defendant Payne on or after January 15, 2011. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2010)
<![CDATA[
Schafer v. Curry et al
Doc. 95
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 12/10/2010 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
--No. C-08-01881 RMW
E-FILED on
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
DANIEL GENE SCHAFER, Plaintiff, v. BEN CURRY, et al., Defendants.
No. C-08-01881 RMW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [Re Docket No. 89]
On November 24, 2010, defendants moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 for a protective order preventing Schafer from deposing defendant Payne until she has new counsel representing her. The court, having found good cause, grants defendants' motion. However, the deposition will not be indefinitely delayed. Plaintiff shall be entitled to depose defendant Payne on or after January 15, 2011. This will provide adequate time for Payne to obtain new counsel.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER JLR
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
