Sarkis v. Lajcak et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting #36 Motion for clarification of filing deadline. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-filed: 11/12/2008 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANTHONY SARKIS, Plaintiff, v. MIROSLAV LAJCAK; OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTATIVE, Defendants. No. C-08-01911 RMW ORDER CLARIFYING REPLY DEADLINE [Re Docket No. 36] The specially appearing defendants have requested clarification regarding the deadline for their reply brief to their motion to dismiss. The court continued the hearing on the motion to dismiss from November 21, 2008 to December 19, 2008. See Docket No. 35 (Nov. 6, 2008). The court's order did not specify that the original briefing schedule would remain operative. Accordingly, the local rules dictate that the defendants' reply is due 14 days before the new hearing date, i.e., December 5, 2008. Civil L.R. 7-7(d). DATED: 11/12/2008 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER CLARIFYING REPLY DEADLINE C-08-01911 RMW TSF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for specially appearing Defendants: Bruce O. Baumgartner bbaumgartner@bakerlaw.com Lisa Inez Carteen lcarteen@bakerlaw.com Mark A. Cymrot mcymrot@bakerlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff: Jeffrey Mark Forster Philip M. Musolino j forstr@pacbell.net pmusolino@musolinoanddessel.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program in each action. Dated: 11/12/2008 TSF Chambers of Judge Whyte United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CLARIFYING REPLY DEADLINE C-08-01911 RMW TSF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?