Seagate Technology, LLC et al v. STEC, Inc

Filing 104

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 stipulated request to remove documents from the ECF system. Request GRANTED as to Docket Nos. 96 and 97. Request DENIED as to Docket No. 98. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/10/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009) Modified docket text to include linkage on 3/16/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) [e-mail] Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128) [e-mail] 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] James M. Dowd (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Caroline Kane (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Kevin C. Heffel (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

*ORDER E-FILED 2/10/2009*

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff STEC, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, a Cayman Islands company; SEAGATE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE. LTD., a Singapore corporation; and MAXTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants, vs. STEC, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
STIPULATION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER TO REMOVE FROM THE ECF SYSTEM INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL)
US1DOCS 7050094v1

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER TO REMOVE FROM THE ECF SYSTEM INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS Judge: Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties to this action--Defendant STEC, Inc. ("STEC") and Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology International, Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Maxtor Corporation (collectively, "Seagate")--respectfully request that the Court issue an order permanently removing from the ECF system the documents linked to Docket Nos. 96, 97, and 98 in the above-referenced action. Good cause exists for this request, as set forth below: On February 2, 2009, STEC e-filed, using the ECF system, the documents at the following three docket entries: (a) Docket No. 96 (STEC, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Discovery; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (dated February 2, 2009)); (b) Docket No. 97 (Declaration of Nathan L. Walker In Support of STEC, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Discovery, and accompanying exhibits); and (c) Docket No. 98 (Proposed Order Granting STEC, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Discovery). The documents at Docket Nos. 96 and 97 contain information and/or constitute material that Seagate previously designated in this action as "confidential" and thus, pursuant to an agreement between the parties and the terms of the Protective Order, should not have been filed in the publicly available ECF system. To correct this filing error, the parties respectfully request that the Court issue an order permanently removing from the ECF system the documents linked to Docket Nos. 96 and 97, as well as the associated proposed order linked to Docket No. 98. STEC represents that it today lodged with the Court, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), STEC's Motion to Compel and the associated declaration and proposed order (documents previously at Docket Nos. 96, 97, and 98). // // //
-1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO REMOVE FROM THE ECF SYSTEM INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL)

US1DOCS 7050094v1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Dated: February 3, 2009

Respectfully submitted, WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE and DORR LLP By: /s/ Nathan L. Walker Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128) [e-mail] 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff STEC, Inc

Dated: February 3, 2009

Respectfully submitted, COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: /s/ Elizabeth S. Pehrson Elizabeth S. Pehrson [e-mail] 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418 Tel. [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology International; Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd.; and Maxtor Corporation

The request is GRANTED as to Docket Nos. 96 and 97. The request is DENIED as to

Docket No. 98 which does not contain or reveal any confidential information. ========================================== PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-2STIPULATION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL)

February 10 2009 __,

__________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ECF ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file documentation showing that Elizabeth S. Pehrson--whose conformed signature is set forth above--concurs in the filing of this document. /s/ Nathan L. Walker Nathan L. Walker

-3STIPULATION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL)