Seagate Technology, LLC et al v. STEC, Inc

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE STEC's Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims re 108 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/27/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2009)

1 ROBERT T. HASLAM (Bar No. 71134) 2 ELIZABETH S. PEHRSON (Bar No. 197302) 3 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Telephone: [phone] ([e-mail]) 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 ([e-mail])

4 Redwood Shores, California 94065 5 Facsimile: [phone]

6 Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 7 Seagate Singapore Int'l Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Maxtor Corp. 8 (Additional counsel at signature page) 9 10 11 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, a Cayman INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE. CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Case No.: CV 08 1950 JW (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STEC'S SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS Judge: Honorable James Ware Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology Int'l,

13 limited liability company; SEAGATE

14 Islands company; SEAGATE SINGAPORE

15 LTD., a Singapore corporation; and MAXTOR 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Covington & Burling LLP

Plaintiffs, v. STEC, INC., Defendant AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS SEAGATE v. STEC, CV 08 1950 JW (HRL)

1

In response to the parties' stipulated request, the Court recently issued an Order that

2 specified, inter alia, that STEC, Inc. shall file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims as a 3 separate docket entry on or before February 10, 2009. (See Docket No. 102.) On February 10, 4 2009, the parties jointly requested that the Court extend that filing deadline to February 13, 2009. 5 (See Docket No. 107.) The parties hereby jointly, and respectfully, request that the deadline for 6 STEC to file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims as a separate docket entry be 7 extended to February 17, 2009. 8 9 February 13, 2009 10 11 12 By: /S/ ELIZABETH S. PEHRSON
Elizabeth S. Pehrson By: /S/ NATHAN L. WALKER Nathan L. Walker WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP MARK D. SELWYN (Bar No. 244180) ([e-mail]) NATHAN L. WALKER (SBN 206128) ([e-mail]) 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JAMES M. DOWD (admitted pro hac vice) ([e-mail]) CAROLINE KANE (admitted pro hac vice) ([e-mail]) 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] KEVIN C. HEFFEL (admitted pro hac vice) ([e-mail]) 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR STEC 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS SEAGATE v. STEC, CV 08 1950 JW (HRL)

Respectfully submitted,

_

13

14 ([e-mail])

ROBERT T. HASLAM (Bar No. 71134) ELIZABETH S. PEHRSON (Bar No. 197302) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

15 ([e-mail])

16 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 17 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone] Redwood Shores, California 94065

19 ([e-mail]) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Covington & Burling LLP

MICHAEL K. PLIMACK (Bar No. 133869) SIMON J. FRANKEL (Bar No. 171552) ([e-mail]) SCOTT A. SCHRADER (Bar No. 219673) ([e-mail]) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR SEAGATE

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Covington & Burling LLP
Dated: February 27, 2009

__________________________ United States District Court Judge

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS SEAGATE v. STEC, CV 08 1950 JW (HRL)

1 2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Section X(B) of General Order No. 45, I attest that concurrence in the filing of

3 the foregoing document has been obtained from each signatory who is not an ECF User, or who is 4 an ECF User but whose User ID and Password has not been utilized in the electronic filing of the 5 document. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Covington & Burling LLP

. /s/ Nathan L. Walker Nathan L. Walker

.

4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS SEAGATE v. STEC, CV 08 1950 JW (HRL)
US1DOCS 7059590v4