Seagate Technology, LLC et al v. STEC, Inc

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend the Deadline for STEC to Serve its Invalidity Contentions and Produce Documents Pursuant to 3-4(b) re 51 Stipulation filed by STEC, Inc. Deadline to serve and produce set for 10/31/2008. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/23/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 James M. Dowd (admitted pro hac vice) james.dowd@wilmerhale.com Caroline Kane (admitted pro hac vice) caroline.kane@wilmerhale.com 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 443-5300 Facsimile: (213) 443-5400 Kevin C. Heffel (admitted pro hac vice) kevin.heffel@wilmerhale.com 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP Robert T. Haslam (SBN 71134) rhaslam@cov.com Nitin Subhedar (SBN 171802) nsubhedar@cov.com Elizabeth S. Pehrson (SBN 197302) epehrson@cov.com 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418 Telephone: (650) 632-4702 Facsimile: (650) 632-4802 Michael K. Plimack (SBN 133869) mplimack@cov.com Scott A. Schrader (SBN 219673) sschrader@cov.com One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 10 11 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, a 19 Cayman Islands company; SEAGATE SINGAPORE 20 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE. LTD., STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] a Singapore corporation; and MAXTOR ORDER TO EXTEND THE 21 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DEADLINE FOR STEC TO SERVE ITS INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Plaintiffs and Counterclaim22 AND PRODUCE DOCUMENTS Defendants, PURSUANT TO 3-4(B) 23 v. 24 STEC, INC., a California Corporation, 25 Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. 26 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 27 28 CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION US1DOCS 6857110v1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff STEC, Inc. ("STEC") and plaintiffs and counterclaim-defendants Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology Int'l, Seagate Singapore Int'l Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Maxtor Corp. ("Seagate") jointly submit this Stipulated Request and Proposed Order and request the Court to extend the deadline for STEC to serve its Invalidity Contentions and produce documents pursuant to 3-4(b) to Friday, October 31, 2008. STIPULATED REQUEST WHEREAS, STEC's "Invalidity Contentions" and document production pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-4(a) and (b) are currently due on Friday, October 24, 2008; WHEREAS, STEC has requested, and counsel for Plaintiffs has agreed to, a one week extension until Friday, October 31, 2008 for STEC to serve its Invalidity Contentions and produce documents pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-4(b) (without modifying the date for producing documents pursuant to L.R. 3-4(a)); WHEREAS, the parties' stipulated request to extend the deadline for STEC to serve its Invalidity Contentions and produce documents pursuant to 3-4(b) will not affect any hearing date; NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying [Proposed] Order granting an extension until Friday, October 31, 2008 for STEC to serve its Invalidity Contentions and produce documents pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-4(b). 10 11 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION US1DOCS 6857110v1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Respectfully submitted, DATED: October 17, 2008 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP /S/ Mark D. Selwyn Attorney for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff STEC, Inc. DATED: October 17, 2008 COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP /S/ Elizabeth S. Pehrson Attorney for Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology Int'l, Seagate Singapore Int'l Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Maxtor Corp. 10 11 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 17th day of October at Palo Alto, California. /S/ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION US1DOCS 6857110v1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court hereby GRANTS the parties' stipulated request to extend the deadline for STEC to serve its Invalidity Contentions and produce documents pursuant to 3-4(b) to Friday, October 31, 2008. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED October 23, 2008 DATED: ____________________________ 10 11 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 JAMES WARE Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate DISTRICT ___________________________________ Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION US1DOCS 6857110v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?