Mehmet v. Paypal, Inc.

Filing 75

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 B. DAVID MEHMET, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-1961 RMW (RS) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL *E-Filed 3/6/09*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PAYPAL, INC., Defendant. / On March 5, 2009, the Court received what pro se plaintiff entitled "Notice of Motion to Compel" to be heard March 11, 2009, without oral argument. In this motion, plaintiff seeks to compel defendant to appear for a deposition and to serve responsive answers to his interrogatories. Before the Court can entertain this motion, plaintiff must comply with the notice and service requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-2. That rule requires that all motions must be filed, served on the opposing party, and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned judge for hearing not less than thirty-five days after service of the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/6/09

RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO: Oleg Cross [e-mail]

AND A COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: B. David Mehmet 130 Church Street, Suite 251 New York, NY 10007 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 3/6/09 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By:______Chambers__________

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2