Eagle North America, Inc. v. Genesis Fluid Solutions, LTD et al
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 27 Motion to Apply California Law to Attorney's Fees. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW TO ISSUE OF ATTORNEY'S FEES--No. C-08-02060 RMW JAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENESIS FLUID SOLUTIONS, LTD., et al., Defendants.
No. C-08-02060 RMW ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW TO ISSUE OF ATTORNEY'S FEES [Re Docket No.27]
Defendant Genesis Fluid Solutions, Ltd. and Michael K. Hodges move to apply California law, Civil Code § 1717, to the issue of attorneys fees in this matter. Plaintiff Eagle North America does not oppose the motion, and stipulates that § 1717 be applied. The court will therefore apply Civil Code § 1717 to the issue of attorney's fees. The hearing scheduled for February 13, 2009 is vacated.
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Randel Jay Campbell Wallace M Tice Counsel for Defendants: Bruce E. Disenhouse Gregory D. Rankin Bdisenhouse@krsattys-riv.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
JAS Chambers of Judge Whyte
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW TO ISSUE OF ATTORNEY'S FEES--No. C-08-02060 RMW JAS 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?