Almeida v. Google, Inc.

Filing 23

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 14 : Motion Hearing on Motion for Class Certification set for 6/19/2008 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/10/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)

Almeida v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BRIAN S. KABATECK SBN 152054 RICHARD L. KELLNER SBN 171416 ALFREDO TORRIJOS SBN 222458 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class DAVID ALMEIDA KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 DAVID J. SILBERT - #173128 RYAN M. KENT - #220441 ALYSE BERTENTHAL - #253012 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation

*E-FILED - 10/10/08*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID ALMEIDA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Case No. C 08-02088 RMW (PVTx) [] SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

423247.01

[] SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 08-02088 RMW
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff David Almeida and defendant Google Inc. came on for a case management conference on August 15, 2008. Having considered the Joint Case Management Statement, the arguments presented by counsel and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders as follows: I. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

The parties have filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting mediation as their preferred ADR process and will complete said mediation process no later than June 9, 2009.

II.

DISCLOSURES

Google Inc. will make the disclosures required by Rule 26, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure within thirty days of the case management conference.

III.

DISCOVERY

The parties may pursue all discovery methods available under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (including depositions, interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production) and will follow the presumptive limits set forth in those Rules, except that the Court orders the limit on depositions made by F.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A)(i) be changed from a maximum of ten depositions to an equivalent maximum hourly quota of 70 hours to be used at the discretion of each party. The parties shall abide by the following discovery schedule: November 2, 2009 November 9, 2009 November 23, 2009 December 7, 2009 December 14, 2009 Non-expert discovery cut-off Expert opening reports Expert opposition reports Expert reply reports Expert discovery cut-off

1
423247.01

[] SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 08-02088 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IV.

CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The following schedule shall apply to Plaintiff's anticipated motion for class certification: April 3, 2009 May 8, 2009 May 22, 2009 June 19, 2009 Last day for Plaintiff to file and serve: (1) expert report(s) on class certification; and (2) motion for class certification. Last day for Defendant to file and serve: (1) expert report(s) on class certification; and (2) opposition to motion for class certification. Last day for Plaintiff to file and serve reply in support of motion for class certification. Hearing on motion for class certification.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/10/08

By: __________________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge

2
423247.01

SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 08-02088 RMW