Welch et al v. City of San Jose

Filing 28

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FROM 5/11/2009 TO 6/8/2009 re 26 Stipulation. Preliminary Pretrial Conference statement due 5/29/2009. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/8/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/6/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jeffrey Welch, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-02132 JW ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City of San Jose, Defendant. / On May 11, 2009, the parties are scheduled to appear for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference. Based on the parties' representation that a Preliminary Pretrial Conference would be premature in light of the parties' settlement discussions, the Court CONTINUES the May 11, 2009 Preliminary Pretrial Conference to June 8, 2009 at 11 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Statement on or before May 29, 2009. The parties' Statement shall inform the Court of the status of their settlement efforts. To the extent that settlement discussions proved unfruitful, the parties shall provide proposed trial dates in their Statement. Dated: May 6, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Carol Lynn Koenig ckoenig@wmjpr.com Christopher Eugene Platten cplatten@wmjpr.com Daniel Alfredo Menendez dmenendez@wmprlaw.com Robert R. Fabela CAO.Main@sanjoseca.gov Dated: May 6, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?