Jordan v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA

Filing 127

ORDER GRANTING 126 STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM OCTOBER 1, 2010 TO DECEMBER 3, 2010. The Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2010 is CONTINUED to 12/3/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/27/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Download PDF
Jones-Boyle v. FDIC Doc. 127 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KAREN L. JONES-BOYLE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, 13 14 v. Plaintiffs, **E-Filed 9/27/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. CV-08-02142-JF (RS) CLASS ACTION -[PROPOSED]-ORDER GRANTING ------------------- 15 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:8SZP1\402944684.1 STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM OCTOBER 1, 2010 TO DECEMBER 3, 2010 Courtroom 3, 5th Floor Hon. Jeremy Fogel Complaint Filed: August 29, 2007 C-08-02142-JF (RS) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, filed as Document ____, and good 126 2 cause appearing, the Court grants the stipulated request and continues the Case 3 Management Conference from October 1, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. to December 3, 2010 at 9:00 4 a.m. to coincide with the hearing on Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s motion to 5 dismiss the Complaint. 6 7 8 9 Dated: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:8SZP1\402944684.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/27/2010 HON. JEREMY FOGEL U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE C-08-02142-JF (RS) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?