Nikoonahad v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc.

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS (approving docket no. 24 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/6/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOHN W. CLARK, State Bar No. 036664 ATTORNEY AT LAW 2600 El Camino Real, Suite 410 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] ARDELL JOHNSON, State Bar No. 095340 KORDA, JOHNSON & WALL, LLP 66 E. Santa Clara Street, Suite 250 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD

**E-Filed 10/6/08**

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, JR., State Bar No. 161934 ANTHONY J WEIBELL, State Bar No. 238850 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD, Plaintiff, v. RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C 08-2290 JF -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mehrdad Nikoonahad ("Nikoonahad") filed a First Amended Complaint on September 24, 2008; WHEREAS, Defendant Rudolph Technologies, Inc. ("Rudolph") intends to file a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which motion must ordinarily be filed within ten days after service of the amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and not later than thirtyfive days prior to the hearing date noticed for the motion pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-2; WHEREAS, Nikoonahad intends to file an opposition to Rudolph's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which opposition must ordinarily be filed not later than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date noticed for the motion pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-3; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Rudolph shall notice any motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint for

hearing on November 21, 2008, the first available hearing date according to the court clerk. 2. Rudolph shall file any motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint by

October 13, 2008. 3. Nikoonahad shall file any opposition to a motion to dismiss the First Amended

Complaint by October 31, 2008. 4. Rudolph shall file any reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss the First

Amended Complaint by November 7, 2008.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: September 26, 2008

KORDA, JOHNSON & WALL, LLP By: /s/ Ardell Johnson Ardell Johnson

Attorneys for Plaintiff MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF

-1-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: September 26, 2008

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell Anthony J Weibell

Attorneys for Defendant RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10/6/08 DATED: ____________________

____________________________________ THE HON. JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order 45, the undersigned certifies that concurrence in the filing of the document was obtained from each of the other signatories. Dated: September 26, 2008 By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell Anthony J Weibell

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF

-2-