Nikoonahad v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc.

Filing 44

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (approving 43 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/23/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN W. CLARK, State Bar No. 036664 ATTORNEY AT LAW 2600 El Camino Real, Suite 410 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 354-3605 Facsimile: (650) 354-3606 Email: john@johnclarklaw.com ARDELL JOHNSON, State Bar No. 095340 KORDA, JOHNSON & WALL, LLP 66 E. Santa Clara Street, Suite 250 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 494-0700 Facsimile: (408) 494-0707 Email: arjoh@pacbell.net Attorneys for Plaintiff MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD **E-Filed 2/24/09** KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, JR., State Bar No. 161934 ANTHONY J WEIBELL, State Bar No. 238850 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: keggleton@wsgr.com; rstrickland@wsgr.com; aweibell@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendant RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD, Plaintiff, v. RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C 08-2290 JF (PVT) -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mehrdad Nikoonahad ("Nikoonahad") filed a Second Amended Complaint on February 6, 2009; WHEREAS, Defendant Rudolph Technologies, Inc. ("Rudolph") intends to file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, Nikoonahad intends to file an opposition to Rudolph's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Rudolph shall notice any motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for hearing on April 24, 2009, which date has been reserved with the Court. 2. Rudolph shall file any motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by March 3, 2009. 3. Nikoonahad shall file any opposition to a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by March 27, 2009. 4. Rudolph shall file any reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by April 10, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: February 12, 2009 KORDA, JOHNSON & WALL, LLP By: /s/ Ardell Johnson Ardell Johnson Attorneys for Plaintiff MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD Dated: February 12, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell Anthony J Weibell Attorneys for Defendant RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF (PVT) -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF (PVT) ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2/23/09 DATED: ____________________ ____________________________________ THE HON. JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order 45, the undersigned certifies that concurrence in the filing of the document was obtained from each of the other signatories. Dated: February 12, 2009 By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell Anthony J Weibell STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 08-2290 JF (PVT) -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?