Gonzalez v. Walker et al
Filing
49
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 41 , 43 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying 42 , 45 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ARMANDO GONZALEZ,
11
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
VIRGA, Warden,
14
Respondent.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 08-2389 RMW (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE
OF APPEAL; DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON
APPEAL
(Docket Nos. 41, 42, 43, 45)
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended petition for a writ of
19
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a criminal judgment from Santa Clara
20
County superior court. (Docket No. 3.) On June 13, 2013, the court denied the petition.
21
(Docket No. 38.) On July 14, 2013, petitioner filed a notice of appeal. See Houston v. Lack,
22
487 U.S. 266, 270-71 (1988). (Docket No. 44.)
23
Petitioner has filed motions for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. (Docket
24
Nos. 41, 43.) Petitioner’s motions for an extension are GRANTED. Petitioner’s notice of
25
appeal filed July 14, 2013 is deemed timely.
26
Petitioner has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. (Docket Nos.
27
42, 45.) Petitioner has previously requested counsel in these proceedings. (Docket Nos. 18,
28
32.) The court has denied each request and advised petitioner that the circumstances of this
Order Granting Mot. for Ext. of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying Motion for Appt. of Counsel
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.08\Gonzalez389eot-noa_deny-atty.wpd
1
case do not warrant appointment of counsel. (Docket Nos. 32, 37.) There has been no change
2
in circumstances that now warrant appointment of counsel and therefore the motions are
3
DENIED. Petitioner’s case is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No.
4
13-16446, and he may renew his request for appointment of counsel in that court.
5
This order terminates docket numbers 41, 42, 43 and 45.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Mot. for Ext. of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying Motion for Appt. of Counsel
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.08\Gonzalez389eot-noa_deny-atty.wpd
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARMANDO R. GONZALEZ,
Case Number: CV08-02389 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
JAMES WALKER, ET AL. et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on August 12, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Armando R. Gonzalez V-74787
C4/206
High Desert State Prison
P.O. Box 3030
Susanville, CA 96127
Dated: August 12, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?