Gonzalez v. Walker et al

Filing 49

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 41 , 43 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying 42 , 45 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ARMANDO GONZALEZ, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 VIRGA, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-2389 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL; DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL (Docket Nos. 41, 42, 43, 45) 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended petition for a writ of 19 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a criminal judgment from Santa Clara 20 County superior court. (Docket No. 3.) On June 13, 2013, the court denied the petition. 21 (Docket No. 38.) On July 14, 2013, petitioner filed a notice of appeal. See Houston v. Lack, 22 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 (1988). (Docket No. 44.) 23 Petitioner has filed motions for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. (Docket 24 Nos. 41, 43.) Petitioner’s motions for an extension are GRANTED. Petitioner’s notice of 25 appeal filed July 14, 2013 is deemed timely. 26 Petitioner has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. (Docket Nos. 27 42, 45.) Petitioner has previously requested counsel in these proceedings. (Docket Nos. 18, 28 32.) The court has denied each request and advised petitioner that the circumstances of this Order Granting Mot. for Ext. of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying Motion for Appt. of Counsel G:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.08\Gonzalez389eot-noa_deny-atty.wpd 1 case do not warrant appointment of counsel. (Docket Nos. 32, 37.) There has been no change 2 in circumstances that now warrant appointment of counsel and therefore the motions are 3 DENIED. Petitioner’s case is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 4 13-16446, and he may renew his request for appointment of counsel in that court. 5 This order terminates docket numbers 41, 42, 43 and 45. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATED: RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Mot. for Ext. of Time to File Notice of Appeal; Denying Motion for Appt. of Counsel G:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.08\Gonzalez389eot-noa_deny-atty.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMANDO R. GONZALEZ, Case Number: CV08-02389 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. JAMES WALKER, ET AL. et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on August 12, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Armando R. Gonzalez V-74787 C4/206 High Desert State Prison P.O. Box 3030 Susanville, CA 96127 Dated: August 12, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?