Masters v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 25

ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 24 Stipulation, filed by Deputy Rogers, Deputy Anderson, Deputy Eng, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department, County of Santa Clara. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on June 15, 2009. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NICK MASTERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 08-02473 PVT ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER On June 12, 2008, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order to governing their respective disclosures of certain confidential material in the above-captioned action. Having reviewed the proposed stipulated protective order, the court finds the following deficiencies: (1) the stipulated protective order fails to reference that confidential material must qualify for protection under the standards developed under Rule 26(c); (2) the stipulated protective order fails to provide appropriate instructions for requesting confidential materials be filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5; and (3) the stipulated protective order fails to include as an exhibit a sample agreement to be bound by the order to be signed by anyone who is given access to confidential information. Additionally, the parties are advised to review the model stipulated protective order on the court's ORDER, page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 website located at www.cand.uscourts.gov. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 15, 2009 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge ORDER, page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER, page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?