Masters v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION re 31 Stipulation filed by Deputy Rogers, Deputy Anderson, Deputy Eng, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department, County of Santa Clara. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on September 28, 2009. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2009)

Download PDF
Case5:08-cv-02473-PVT Document31 Filed09/16/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ, Acting County Counsel (S.B. #184621) DAVID M. ROLLO, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #111998) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 70 West Hedding, East Wing, 9th Floor San Jose, California 95110-1770 Telephone: (408) 299-5900 Facsimile: (408) 292-7240 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY ENG, DEPUTY ANDERSON AND DEPUTY ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE) NICK MASTERS, Plaintiff, v. 15 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M IG U E L M Á R Q U E Z A c tin g C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 0802473 PVT XXXXXXXXXX STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT: An ORDER be entered allowing for and requiring plaintiff Nick Masters to undergo a physical examination on September 28, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. at the offices of Paul J. Mills, M.D., located at 1101 Welch Road, #C8, in Palo Alto, CA 94304. Dr. Mills is a Board certified orthopedic surgeon. It is expected that the musculoskeletal examination will include simple observation of the individual at rest and with movement, such as routine walking sitting, changing positions and so forth. Also examined and documented is the outward appearance of the parts of the body under consideration, as well as the range of motion of the extremities and/or trunk, the visible muscle mass, as well as the palpable tone. Also assessed are reflexes, sensation, strength of muscles on resisted testing, as well as circumferential measurements S t ip u la tio n and [Proposed] Order for Physical E xa m in a tio n -1 - 0 8 0 2 4 7 3 PVT Case5:08-cv-02473-PVT Document31 Filed09/16/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M IG U E L M Á R Q U E Z A c tin g C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a applying a tape measure to extremities. When the examination focuses on joints and the muscles that affect those joints, the assessment could include active range of motion and occasionally passive or assisted range of motion. It is also stipulated and agreed that plaintiff may have an observer present throughout the procedure. Plaintiff understands and agrees that failure to keep this appointment could result in his being held responsible for any costs or cancellation fees that might result from an unwarranted nonappearance. The Defendant County of Santa Clara agrees to bear all other costs of the examination without prejudice to any right the County might have to seek recovery of said costs should it prevail in this case. I hereby attest that I have on file the holograph signatures for the signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: September 14, 2009 Respectfully submitted, MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ Acting County Counsel By: /S/ DAVID M. ROLLO Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY ENG, DEPUTY ANDERSON AND DEPUTY ROGERS Dated: September 15, 2009 By: /S/ B. ROBERT ALLARD, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________________________________ September 28, 2009 _____________________________________ HONORABLE PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL U.S. Magistrate Judge 207375.wpd S t ip u la tio n and [Proposed] Order for Physical E xa m in a tio n -2 - 0 8 0 2 4 7 3 PVT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?